My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2022 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
08-10-2022 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2022 7:58:52 PM
Creation date
9/21/2022 7:50:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The applicant has submitted supplemental information regarding the existing conditions and unique <br />circumstances related to this property. Cara Builders seeks a Variance for the reduction in the rear <br />yard setback and lot depth for Lots 1-7. <br /> <br />Block 1, Lot <br />Number Rear Yard Setback Requirement <br />1 30 ft 40 ft <br />2 30 ft 40 ft <br />3 30 ft 40 ft <br />4 30 ft 40 ft <br />5 30 ft 40 ft Block 2, Lot <br />Number <br />1 30 ft 40 ft <br />2 30 ft 40 ft <br />3 30 ft 40 ft <br />Block 1, Lot <br />Number Lot Depth Requirement <br />1 98.59 ft 130 ft <br />2 98.50 ft 130 ft <br />3 98.50 ft 130 ft <br />4 98.50 ft 130 ft <br />5 98.50 ft 130 ft Block 2, Lot <br />Number <br />1 98.50 ft 130 ft <br />2 98.50 ft 130 ft <br />3 98.50 ft 130 ft <br />The lot configuration of the parcel proves to be unique as well as the floodplain (Zone A) located at <br />the northern part of the property and the placement of the city standard cul-de-sac prevent some of <br />the lots from conforming to the regular standards of the R-1 District. <br /> <br />City staff does not find this proposal to be detrimental to the public health, welfare, or injurious to <br />other property in the territory in which the property is situated. <br /> <br />The physical aspects of the property are the main reason for the variance request in that it produces <br />an extreme hardship that is limited to the configuration of the site along with the floodplain located <br />on the site. In addition, under Minnesota law, we find that practical difficulty has been met, meaning <br />(1) the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner permitted by the <br />ordinance, (2) the owner's plight is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />property owner. <br /> <br />The request for variance is not based on an economic hardship and solely based on the physical <br />aspects of the site and is the best and highest use of the property. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.