My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-09 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
01-26-09 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2009 1:23:59 PM
Creation date
2/6/2009 7:37:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 26, 2009 <br />The City Engineer reviewed the existing road conditions and noted that <br />based on those conditions a mill and overlay of the street is being <br />proposed to re-establish the crown. Approximately 1 1/2" of the edges of <br />the street will be milled off tapering toward the center of the street. The <br />street will then be overlaid with bituminous. There will be minor curb <br />repair and replacement of badly damaged curb sections to improve curb <br />drainage. The Engineer noted that given the level of oil prices as well as <br />the bidding environment, it is felt that very favorable bids will be received <br />for this work. <br />The Engineer then reviewed the City's Assessment Policy relative to mill <br />and overlay projects, noting that 50% of the cost is assessed to benefitting <br />properties with the City paying the remaining 50% of the project. The <br />Engineer noted that the total estimated cost of the project is $289,300.00. <br />The residential assessment rate is $18.98 per front foot. <br />The Engineer then reviewed the proposed project schedule should the <br />project move forward. He noted that the proposed assessment roll is also <br />included for property owners' review, and pointed out that the <br />condominium assessment reflected on the assessment roll would be <br />divided by the number of condo units. <br />The Engineer then reviewed an issues list supporting why City staff feels <br />that the project should move forward. That listing included information <br />on the competitive bidding environment, oil prices, the fact that the City is <br />maintaining the assessment rate at 2008 levels, the fact that this <br />assessment rate has been artificially suppressed for a number of years <br />given it has been inflated by 3% annually when the market increases have <br />been over 6% from 1996-2006, and that interest rates are at a very <br />favorable level. <br />The City Administrator noted the interest rates that the City has utilized <br />over the past five year period. He pointed out that if bonds were sold <br />today, the City would utilize an interest rate of 4.75% for a Yen year <br />assessment, which is below the rates charged for the past five years. The <br />Administrator presented a sample assessment calculation comparing a 6% <br />interest rate and a 4.75% interest rate fora $1,500 assessment, noting an <br />approximately $110 savings in interest over a 10 year assessment period. <br />Another option would spread the assessment out over a 15 year period, <br />however, the interest rate for that time period would be approximately <br />5.35%, increasing interest costs to the point where this may not be the best <br />option. <br />The City Administrator indicated that given the fact that oil prices are <br />down and the bidding climate is very competitive, City staff feels that this <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.