Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 25, 2009 <br />his concern for the aesthetics of the building and the damage that the <br />mounting of individual sign letters does to a building. Wagner stated that <br />they wanted the flexibility on working with individual tenants on either lit <br />or non-lit wall signage. <br />Keis stated that he would like to see some consistency with the signage. <br />He indicated that he prefers the non-raceway signage, feeling that the <br />individually mounted letters look better and noting that this is what has <br />been enforced in other parts of the City. Wagner invited the Council to <br />look at his building in Oakdale, noting that many holes in the building <br />caused by the changing out of individually-mounted sign letters. Wagner <br />felt that if a raceway sign is done correctly, the raceway will not be <br />apparent. <br />McGraw noted that the proposal calls for wall signage on both the north <br />and east walls. McGraw suggested consistency in the signage noting that <br />there could be illuminated signage allowed on one wall and non- <br />illuminated on the other. <br />Wagner pointed out that Final Cut is a tenant on the east elevation of the <br />building and their sign is not lit. Midwest Gymnastics will also be located <br />on that side of the building and they want a lit sign for visibility purposes. <br />Wagner stated that he wanted the flexibility to offer tenants either lit or <br />non-lit signage and did not want to lose a tenant over that issue. <br />Keis asked how many of the tenants would be open in the evening, <br />suggesting there may be limited need for lit signage. Wagner pointed out <br />that most will be open in the evening. Keis suggested that if tenants have <br />their name on the pylon, there would be less of a need for lit signage. <br />Wagner reported that the pylon is very small for the size of the building, <br />and there would not be room on the pylon for signage for every tenant. <br />Wagner also noted that the building is very large, and given the layout of <br />the building in relation to the street, the small side of the building is used <br />Co calculate allowable signage area. Wagner stated that he wanted the <br />flexibility on lit or non-lit tenant wall signage. <br />Montour noted the struggles that the City has had with signage, and <br />appreciated the building owner's reluctance to put holes in the building. <br />Montour stated that his concern with raceway signage is that it would stick <br />out from the building rather than mount flush. He felt there would be <br />inconsistency in the signage appearance. Wagner stated that they would <br />ensure that the signage was aesthetically pleasing. <br />Keis pointed out that sign regulations are not unique to Little Canada. <br />Wagner agreed, but felt that using the narrowest wall to calculate <br />allowable signage put the property at a disadvantage. <br />