Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 22, 2009 <br />The City Attorney noted the proposed requirement that pet therapy visits <br />be logged. Anderson replied that they could comply with that <br />recommendation. The City Attorney felt that the ordinance needed to <br />include a reasonable standard for the number of pet therapy visits per year. <br />Anderson suggested that he work with the City Administrator to define a <br />standard. Anderson indicated that cun•ently they do pet therapy visits on <br />Tuesdays, Thursdays, and two on Saturdays. Their minimum is typically <br />three visits per week. <br />Montour stated that he agreed with the concept, but felt the language in the <br />ordinance needed to be tightened up a little more. <br />The City Attorney suggested that the concept could be approved with the <br />understanding that the Anderson's will work with staff on additional <br />ordinance criteria. The revised amendment could then be brought back to <br />the Council for approval. Montour suggested the ordinance include a <br />definition of credentialed pet therapy. Blesener agreed that additional <br />criteria should be added. <br />Sharon Anderson reported that pet therapy certification is done by either <br />the Delta Society or TDI, and suggested that the ordinance require <br />certification by one of these two organizations. Anderson also agreed that <br />a certain average number of visits per year should be required in the <br />ordinance. <br />Keis noted that a property owner could do pet therapy with two or three <br />dogs and not be subject to the additional requirements that will be <br />included in the ordinance. It is only when a property owner wants four <br />dogs that the pet therapy requirements would come into play. Keis stated <br />that he applauded the Anderson's efforts. His only concern was for when <br />the dogs became too old to work that the Anderson's would want <br />additional animals and would not want to get rid of their older dogs. Paul <br />Anderson stated that they had no desire to exceed a maximum of four <br />dogs. <br />Sharon Anderson reported on the importance of this volunteer effort to <br />her. She indicated that the hospitals and people they work with rely on <br />them, and it would be very difficult to stop this volunteer activity. <br />Anderson stated that they will continue this work for as long as they can. <br />Paul Anderson asked if the Council would act on the issue this evening so <br />that they can begin working with a second team of dogs. He agreed to <br />work with the City Administrator on additional ordinance criteria. The <br />City Attorney suggested that this additional criteria could be presented to <br />the Council at their next meeting for adoption. <br />