Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTUS <br />CITY COUNCIL, <br />APRIL 22, 2009 <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2009-4-90 -APPROVING THE AMENDMENT <br />TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, II01. DOGS AND CATS, AS <br />PROPOSED BY THE CITYADMINISTRATOR WITH THE <br />UNDERSTANDING THAT ADDITIONAL PET TIXERAPY CRITERIA <br />WILL BE PRESENT TO THE COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION <br />AT THE MAY 13, 2009 MEETING O UTLINING MORE <br />CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTSAS WELL AS, A <br />REASONABLE EXPECTATIONAS TO NUMBER OF PET <br />THERAPY VISXT S PER YEAR <br />1'he foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes {4). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />OUTDOOR 'The City Administrator noted that over the course of updating outdoor <br />STORAGE storage standards in the 1-I Dish•ict, the issue of an outdoor storage license <br />LLCLNS)/ was discussed numerous times. He listed the various meeting dates at <br />which this discussion occurred. The Administrator also pointed out that <br />the I-I District Ordinance amendment that was adopted requires a separate <br />business license for the activity of outdoor storage. The Administrator <br />pointed out that a number of the industrial property owners were present at <br />these meetings when this discussion occurred. The Administrator pointed <br />that there was discussion about the licensing of outdoor storage as well as <br />requiring an Interim Use Permit for off-site outdoor storage. There may <br />have been sotne confusion over these two issues. <br />'fhe Administrator then reviewed the Code Enforcement Officer's report <br />dated April 17, 2009 within which she recommends a licensing process as <br />well as a $50 amtual outdoor storage license fee. The process also <br />includes a temporary license fee for properties out of conformance with a <br />90-day period under the temporary license to get a property into <br />conformance. The Administrator noted that the outdoor storage license is <br />another enforcement tool for the Council. <br />Blesener agreed that the licensing of outdoor storage was discussed a <br />number of times. Blesener stated that he supported the licensing process <br />recommended of the Code Enforcement Officer with the extension of the <br />90 day temporary license to a 120 day period. Blesener felt a second 120 <br />days temporary license should be an option. After that point, if a property <br />was not in compliance the outdoor storage license would not be issued and <br />the CUP revocation process would begin. Blesener also suggested that if a <br />property falls out of compliance within the first tlnee years, another <br />temporary license should be an option, perhaps at a $500 fee. After that <br />point, however, there should be no more accommodations made. Blesener <br />]0 <br />39 <br />