My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-99 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
12-09-99 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2009 12:33:32 PM
Creation date
5/21/2009 10:45:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />J <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />northwest associated consultants, inc. <br />T0: Little Canada P1ayor and City Council <br />FROM: Jay Baago <br />DATE: 22 April 1985 <br />RE: Peterson Maintenance Expansion <br />FILE N0: 758.09 - 85.10 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Peterson.Maintenance Corporation (PMC) has applied for permits to construct <br />a second structure on their site in Ryan Industrial Park. The specific site <br />is Lot 3, Bleck 1 along Ryan Drive. The lot is wide (550 feet) and shallow <br />(131 feet at its deepest). As the entire park is under a PUD, setbacks for <br />new buildings are negotiable, provided that the developer can demonstrate <br />that the setback changes allow more desirable conditions of traffic flow, <br />loading, parking, or other performance standards. An original site plan <br />for the_.proposed was reviewed (Planner's Report dated 27 March 1985) but <br />found unacceptable as the plan lacked essential information upon which to <br />base a review. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The proposed building would be used as a storage facility and would thus be <br />classified as an accessory use. It is open on one side for access and loading. <br />Setback from the Burlington Northern Railroad is shown as 5 feet (see attached <br />Exhibit B). As mentioned previously, such setback encroachments are acceptable, <br />provided other performance standards are met which create a more functional site. <br />Below are the applicable site requirements and relative Ordinance regulations: <br />Easements. The proposed structure is located on an NSP easement and, as such, <br />would require written approval from the utility that construction on that <br />location is acceptable. <br />4820 minnetonka blvd. minneapc Page 9 4Z0 554 i 6 Cel. 6 i Z/9Z5-9420 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.