My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-09 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-22-09 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2009 1:25:11 PM
Creation date
7/2/2009 1:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINI7TES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 22, 2009 <br />Montour stated that he appreciated Khan's concerns, but noted that the <br />City has been working with the Sheriff s Department and the rental <br />housing community, including Montreal Courts Apartments to make the <br />City safer. He noted the work that has gone into implementing rental <br />housing licensing. Blesener pointed out that the City continues to work on <br />public safety issues. <br />Khan stated that without the fence she would have to live like a prisoner iu <br />her home. Montour felt there were other ways to address this issue, such <br />as natural plantings. Khan suggested that she plant trees along the fence <br />and that the City allow the fence to remain until the trees get large enough <br />to provide screening. <br />Keis felt that all property owners deserved to feel safe in their own homes. <br />However, he did not feel the fence solved the problem, and noted that it <br />causes the City other problems. Keis indicated that this is a difficult <br />situation and suggested that the City work with Khan to find other <br />solutions. McGraw agreed that the situation was difficult, and noted that <br />the City cannot legislate behavior. He pointed out that the decision the <br />Council makes on the Variance request effects everyone in the City, and if <br />approved, the City will have no grounds to deny similar requests. <br />McGraw suggested that if the City agrees to allow the fence to remain <br />until trees provide screening, the trees will have to be a minimum of 5 feet <br />in height when planted. Khan requested that she be allowed a minimum of <br />two years to have the fence while trying to establish a screen of trees. <br />With regard to the precedent, Khan pointed out that no everyone in the <br />City lives in such an unsafe area. <br />'T'here was no one else present wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Boss, seconded by McGraw, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Montour asked how an action plan could be put together to address the <br />concept of a temporary fence until trees grow large enough to provide <br />screening. The City Administrator suggested that a development <br />agreement could be put together to govern this option. He noted that the <br />most likely place to plant trees is right where the fence is. The <br />Administrator suggested that there may be an opportunity to work with the <br />neighbor to plant trees right on the property line, allowing the fence to <br />remain temporarily. <br />Keis asked if a temporary fence would require a variance. The City <br />Attorney suggested that a variance would be necessary, noting that <br />approval or denial of a variance requires findings that list the special <br />conditions and circumstances of the situation. The Attorney indicated that <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.