Laserfiche WebLink
RICE STREET DEVELOPMENT // Parking Study <br /> <br />Alliant No. 223-0050 <br />PAGE 4 <br />In Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference., each of the seven comparable apartments are included once <br />again. However, this time they are ordered by the calculated rate of occupied spaces to occupied apartment <br />units. This provides a better understanding of how the available spaces (supply) are utilized by the tenants <br />(demand). The proposed <br />Rice Street development, with its calculated 1.48 spaces per unit, would be higher than most comparable <br />apartments except for two. Across all seven comparable apartments the highest utilization was 88 percent, with <br />all other apartments utilizing less than 80 percent of available spaces and many utilizing less than 70 percent. <br />Table 3. Parking Generation Estimate – Occupied Spaces per Occupied Unit <br /> <br />Apartment Units Occupied <br />Units <br />Available <br />Spaces <br />Occupied <br />Spaces <br />Occupied <br />Spaces / <br />Unit <br /> The Reeve <br />4600 Lake Road Ave, Robbinsdale, MN 118 98 210 118 1.20 <br />Litmore <br />75 Twin Lake Blvd, Little Canada, MN 60 60 124 75 1.25 <br />The Isaac <br />2740 Fairview Ave N, Roseville, MN 127 113 184 145 1.28 <br />ITE Parking Generation Manual 160 -210 -1.31 <br /> The McMillan <br />157 Grass Lake Pl, Shoreview, MN 135 135 223 178 1.32 <br />Lica <br />45 Twin Lake Blvd, Little Canada, MN 60 34 122 49 1.44 <br />Rice Street Development <br />Proposed 160 -237 -1.48 <br /> Sibley Cove <br />1996 County Road D E, Maplewood, MN 81 77 178 121 1.57 <br />Cedars Lakeside <br />2800 Rustic Pl, Little Canada, MN 160 152 299 262 1.72