Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> t4Ii'IUTES <br /> City Council <br /> (Cont'd,) <br /> January 24, 1980 <br /> ¢rad Nielson stated that the next thing for the Planning Commission <br /> and Council to review is the proposed Zoning Ordinance. The Council <br /> and Planning Commission have already reviewed the first two major <br /> sections of the Ordinance. and Mr. Nielson will go through the <br /> recommended changes in these two sections tonight. <br /> Mr. Nielson submitted to those present a table regulating parking <br /> lot dimensions. Per. Nielson suggested that this table be reviewed <br /> for possible substitution of the table presently included on page <br /> 22 of tl~e proposed Zoning Ordinance. The table P1r. Nielson is <br /> suggesting the Council and Planning Commission adopt is more Flexible <br /> than the previous one suggested. <br /> Next Mr. Nielson submitted to those present a section covering home <br /> occupations. The Planner feels that home occupations should be <br /> addressed in the proposed Zoning Ordinance. Under this proposed <br /> section, ail home occupations would require a permit. However, <br /> only certain home occupation permits would require Council action. <br /> Councilman De¢ace stated that he was not in favor of licensing home <br /> occupations unless they became a nuisance. <br /> ¢rad Nielson stated that the Council and Planning Commission should look <br /> this over and if it is too restrictive, it can be changed. Mr. Nielson <br /> is suggesting this home occupation section be included in the Zoning <br /> Ordinance under the General Provisions Section. <br /> Mr. Nielson then submitted to the Council and Planning Commission a <br /> section to be included in the proposed Zoning Ordinance covering <br /> signs. ~tielson stated that the Planning Comrission and Council may <br /> feel this section is too restrictive, but should review it and make <br /> any recommendations they feel necessary. <br /> Mr. Nielson then began the review of the suggestions that the Council <br /> and Planning Commission have previously made with regard to the <br /> proposed Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Mr. Fahey stated that the wording "Zoning Administrator" under <br /> Section 901.040 was questioned previously. Mr. Nielson stated that <br /> anyone could be appointed as Zoning Administrator. Then if the City <br /> at a later date decides to hire a Zoning Administrator, the ordinance <br /> would not have to be changed to provide for this position. <br /> Mr. Nielson stated that the typographical error on page a would be <br /> corrected to read "exits". <br /> Mr. Nielson stated that the word "non-conforming" would be added to <br /> Section 903.010 under point 6 as suggested. <br /> Page -3- <br /> <br />