Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> September 8, 1980 <br /> However, it would be noted that these assessments are deferred until <br /> the property is sold. <br /> P1r. Krueger of 3025 Arcade Street appeared before the Council. Mr. <br /> Krueger stated that his property was originally included in Improvement <br /> No. 78-19 which was not approved. Now Mr. Krueger has received an <br /> assessment notice for improvements under 78-18. <br /> The Engineer reported that there is a watermain in front of the Krueger <br /> property which looped from the Westwinds project. <br /> P1r. Krueger stated that he feels he should not be assessed for the watermain <br /> as there is no water stub and he does not have the capability to hook up <br /> to water if he wanted. <br /> Councilman De6ace stated that if the Council assessed Mr. Krueger for <br /> the watermain the City would have to provide him with a stub and there <br /> would be an additional assessment for putting in the stub. <br /> The Engineer suggested that if water goes farther up Arcade Street <br /> a stub could be installed at that time. <br /> The City Clerk asked if Per. Krueger would be assessed at the same rate <br /> that the Westwinds water project went in. The Engineer informed the <br /> Council that the City put that project in at about $12.00 per foot versus <br /> the $14.90 per foot for Improvement No. 78-18. <br /> Councilman Fahey stated that perhaps the Krueger stub could be installed <br /> when the City had another watermain project going in. Fahey suggested <br /> that the City assess Krueger at the $14.90 rate and install the stub, or <br /> assess Krueger later when the stub is put in. <br /> Krueger was agreeable to the $14.90 rate if that price included the cost <br /> of the stub. <br /> Councilman Fahey pointed out that he is listed as one of the properties <br /> being assessed for Improvement No. 78-18. Fahey stated that he already <br /> has City water and that he was incorrectly included in this assessment <br /> roll. <br /> Fahey suggested that Mr. Krueger be assessed for the improvement and deferred <br /> until the City installs a water stub to his property. <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 80-9-332 - CLOSING TFIE PUBLIC FIE:ARING <br /> ON IMPROVEMENT N0. 78-18 <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br /> Ayes (5) Fahey, Scalze, Flanson, Nadeau, DeBace. <br /> Nayes (0). <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Page 216. <br /> Page -8- <br /> <br />