02-11-81 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mzr~urEs CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 11, 1981 Johnson Mr. Bill Johnson appeared before the Council requesting the d.ivision of Property Lots D and E from his property on Keller Parkway and also the vacation Division of Lake Street located south of the cul de sac that runs along his property. Council asked P4r. Johnson what his intentions were concerning lake rights. Mr. Johnson stated that he would like to retain 1ake rights for himself, but should he split two additional lots from the portion of his property on La&ore Road, these lots would not have lake rights. The City Clerk also pointed out that there is an alteyway in this area. Council felt the alleyway should also be considered for vacation. P4r. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its acloption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-2-66 - CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEFlRING ON THE POSSIBLE VACFlTIOM OF LAKE STREET SOUTN OF THE CUL DE SAC FlS DESCRIBED IN RFGISTERED LAND SURVEY #64 Fl~ID TNE DIVISION OF LOTS D& E ALSO DESCRIBED I~I REGISTERED LAPIQ SURVEY ~k6a AND THE POSSIRLE VACATIOM OF THE FlLLEYblAY RUNNING 147.59 fEET TO THE EAST OF LAKE STRFET The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. flanson. Flyes (4) Fahey, Hanson, Nardini, Scalze. Nayes (0). Mr. Forsberg was not present at the time of the vote. Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Pages 39 and 40. Request To John and Patty Guzik appeared before the Council requesting to hook up Hook Up To to water on Little Canada Road from a lot they own which fronts on Water On Schletty Dr9ve. The Guzik's stated that they cannot get FHA financing Little if they are not allowed to hook up to City water. Canada Rd. Mrs. Scalze reminded the Council that they did not allow another party to hook up to water in this same area. Apparently the residents of Schletty 4loods are concerned that those people that hook up from Little Canada Road will not pay the assessments for water should it ever be put in on Schletty Drive. Therefore, the remaining residents of Schletty bloods would have to bear a greater cost. Mrs, Scalze stated that one resident of Schletty 4loods was a1lowecl to hook up to water and the remaining residents of Schletty Woods were very upset about it. Mr. Fahey suggested that the Guzik's could be allowed to hook up on Little Canada Road as long as they agreed that should water come in on Schletty Drive, they would not be opposed and would pay their fair assessment. Fahey stated that this possibility was not brought up in the past when discussing this situation with the residents of Schletty Woods. Page -8-