Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />February 25, 1981 <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its aGOption: <br />RESOLUTI0~1 ~10. 81-2-95 - DECLFlRIPIG CITY POLICY TH~T THE CI7Y <br />u!ILL COVER TO 7HE FULLES7 EXTENT FlLLOWFD ~Y LAI~ THE COST OF <br />DEFENSE OR FlNY LIFlBILITY DAMAGES FOR TTS APPOINTED P,ND <br />ELECTED OFfICIALS INCLUDING TFIE VFlRIOUS COMMISSION MEP4QERS <br />OF THE CITY FOR APIY OF THEIR FlCTIONS TFlKEN ON BFHALF OF THF <br />CITY FlND DECLARING THAT THIS RESOL.UTION 6~!ILL LFlPSE IN TFIE <br />EVENT THAT THE CITY 0[3TAINS INSURANCE COVERFlGE fOR THIS EXPOSURE <br />The foregoing resolution was du1y seconded by Mrs. Nardini. <br />Pyes (5) Fahey, Nardini, Flanson, Forsberg, Scalze. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 58. <br />Mr. Fahey pointed out that this policy wou1d have a deductible somewhere <br />fi'rom $2,500 to $5,000. If the Council purchases the insurance coverage, <br />the Council should authorize the City to pick up the cost of the deductible <br />to the extent allowed by law. <br />Rocky Mayor hlanson informed the Council that the hear~ng notice on the Rocky <br />Waite Waite rezoning indicated that the property was zonecl R-3. The proposed <br />Property razoning was indicated as R-2. Mayor Hanson indfcated that it was the <br />Ruth Str. intent of the Council for the proposed rezoning to be for F-1. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that the last hearing was to go from R-3 to PUfI R-2, <br />That hearing was he7d. Council then intended to call for a hearing for <br />R-7, The notice should be for R-1. <br />The Planner stated that if this was the Council's intent, the hearing should <br />be repub1ished. <br />Mrs. Nardini indicated that the City has a proposal for the cost of the <br />appraisa1s on the Ruth Street Property, the Schrier property, and the <br />property on Viking Drive for $400 per appraisal. Estimates have also <br />been made that the down-zoning of these properties could cost the City <br />$500,000. The City hasn`t got this kind of money. Mrs. Nardini questioned <br />whether the City should have the appraisals done. <br />Mr, Forsberg stated that he would l~ke to have the appraisals done. <br />Mrs, Sca7ze commented that the Ruth Street property that is next to the <br />railroad tracks is not a real desirab]e piece of R-1 property, Mrs. <br />Scalze felt the Waite proposa1 would be a good transit9onal use. <br />Mayor Hanson agreed that what Mr, Waite is proposing is better than <br />apartment bui1dings. <br />The City Clerk indicated that R-2 zoning would a11ow duplexes, The C1erk <br />also stated that the Council authorized the hearings at the January 2f3 meeting. <br />At the February 11 meeting the C,ouncil talked about goin~ from R-3 to R-2 <br />on the Waite prnperty, <br />Page -II- <br />