04-22-81 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Flpril 22, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Nanson. Ayes (5) Sca7ze, Hanson, Forsberg, Mardini, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 132. Zilge & The Engineer reported that he has contacted propertyowners in the area R& S of the Zi1ge property concerning providing road access through to Property Woodlyn Avenue. A. C. Black has no objection to the proposal as Division they have ~11 their improvements in and would not be assessed for additional road improvement. Mr. Donovan is not interested in the improvement and stated that he would oppose it. Mr. Deeb does not want an additional road. Mr. McGuff is also not interested in the improvement. The Engineer reported that McGuff is storing equipment on his property and the Engineer informed him that at such time as he came in for a bui7ding permit, the City would probably require a road easement from him. Mrs. Scalze asked if Mr. McGuff could store equipment without a permit. The City Clerk replied that under the new ordinance a permit is required. Mr. Zilge reported that Mr. Deeb is not against an easement on his property for emergency vehic1es, but he does not want a road. Mr. Zilge also stated that Preferred Sheetmetal, Field Econorr~y, R& S and Empire Bucket do not want a road. Mr. Zilge stated that R& S would just like to build a storage shed. The shed would cause no additiona1 traffic in the area. The shed would be used to store parts and autos. Mrs. Scalze informed Mr. Zilge that the City has no way to get access into that area unless someone comes in for a building permit. Mrs. Scalze stated that the City must provide for access for that property, as in the next 20 years the property will change. Mr. Fahey suggested that the Counc~7 require that a road easement be dedicated along the water works property. The Engineer stated that there were problems with some of the alternatives the Planner proposed for road access, and suggested that the road easement run along the water works pro~erty. Bill Gervais asked the Council if anyone has contacted the water works re- garding crossing the water works property to Ryan's development. Mr. Forsberg suggested that the City Engineer 7ook into this. The Engineer stated that this alternative would be expensive as the City would have to construct a bridge to go over pipes on the water works property. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-~4-199 - APPROVI~IG THE ZILGE PROPERTY DI ISION CONTINGENT U N THE GRANTING TO THE CITY OF A 40-FOOT ROFlD EASEMENT ALONG THE WATER k~ORKS PROPERTY Page -15-