06-10-81 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL June 10, 1981 M.Fl.C. Properties 9s planning to ~ence this property. The Planner stated that the property is required to be fenced, but it on1y has to be screened where it can be seen from the street. Mrs. Nardini asked the Planner what the requirements would be for fencing the easement. The Planner stated that the easement would be for future road purposes, and that it could be fenced also until such time as it would be needed. Mr. Fahey suggested that the easement be approximately 50 feet wide to conform with Soo Lane. Maureen Gervais, represen~ing Rose and Bill Gervais, appeared before the Council. Gervais asked what type of screening would be required from the Gervais properties. The Planner stated that the Gervais property is zoned industria7, but used for residential. It is not required that industrial property be screened. The Planner also stated that the fence could be eight feet high and right up to the property line. Gervais also asked if there would be any grading done in the area of the Gervais property. M.A.C. Properties replied that no grading activity is planned. Mrs. Nardini introduced the follow9ng resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. ~1-6-277 -CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE M.Fl.C. PROPERTIES RE~UEST FOR ISSUFlNCE OF Fl C,ONDITIOPlAL USE PERMIT FOR OU7DOOR STORAGE The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. qyes (5) Nardini, Forsberg, Scalze, Fahey, Hanson. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 208, Mrs. Scalze pointed out that this request still must be considered by the Planning Commission. The CSty Planner suggested that the Council could approve the request subject to a favorable review 6y the Planning Commission. The Planner a7so suggested that the Counci1 cons9der the possibility of a cu7-de-sac on the south end of Soo Lane for turn-around purposes. The P1anner pointed out that the City's ordinance prohibits dead-end streets. Mr. Forsberg did not feel ~hat a cul-de-sac was necessary. Mr, Hanson introduced the following resolution and moved tts adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 81-6-278 - APPROVING THE CONDI7IONFlL USE PERMIT FOR M.A.C. PROPERTIES FOR OUTDOOR S70RAGE COPlTINGENT UPON Fl FAVORABLE REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DIRECTIPlG THE PLANNER TO POINT OUT TO THE PLFlNNING COMMISSION HIS SUGGESTSON FOR A CUL DE SAC ON THE NORTH PORTION Of THE PROPERTY INVOLVEQ FlND FURTHER CONTINGENT UPON THE GRANTING TO THF CTTY ~Y M,A.C. PROPERTTES FlN EASEMENT THE WIDTFI OF S00 LANE FROM THE NORTHERN BOUNDFlP,Y Of THE M,Fl.C. PROPERTTES TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY ALONG TFIE WESTERN EpGE OF THE PROPERTY Page -4-