08-12-81 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I~fINUTZIS City Couxicil August 1.2~ :1.9II1 i'~Ix, Lupe presEnted the a~Aayor with an adentii'ication oi' the Cityas bodies of water based upo~ the three idezzt:i.fica.ti.ons tha~: the UPitZ xzas. i°ir, liupe stated that tkze City lias 60 days in which to :revie;w (;txesc cl:-~s;:;.i:':i;~,tion.s anci comment upoxi tkiem, 7:;P ~.}ie GaGy dis~,utes these class`.fications~ it skiould ca.:unen'c o:n why it disputes tkzern, 7'he ;':Lanzxex~ sta4;ed tha:t tkte County recently advised him tkiat ~evexal o.f the :Laices in the Cit;y Urere not ~a~es, but i•reLlancls. '1'kze County has recent].y cha,ziged thas posita.on9 ancl the wetla,nds are uow classa~'ied as l.akes again, i~ir, Fahey cornmented that the classzCica'tiort of Round I,ake cou],d ~:ffect the development of the Schrier property, i1r, Lupe in~'ormed the Council that he wi11, be rev:ieroring the CityPs ordanance and vaa.7.1 commen~; on how it a.s deficient in terms o£ shore land mana.gement, He will get tha.s report to the Council as soon as possible, I~r, Lupe also stated that there are proba,bly a a.ot of structures ai.ozag bodies of water that are a 1ot closer to the lakes than allorred> Shou:l.d these structures ever burn down9 the DNR woul.d like the City to enforce the ordinarxce in the redevelopment o~' such properties. The DNR would l;i.ke _its criteria ~'or developmexit along a lake met wherever possible, i'firs. Sca:tze stated that there is a lot of property along 1?ound .Lake ~d the City~ s two untzamed basa.ras that is not developed, 1'~ir, Lupe sta'ted that the ilNR zaill wortz witYa tlae City in its ordinance aloption process. Some of the areas that the llNi7. would like controls in are in J.ot area and width, whether the property is sewered or n.o't9 setbacks, :impervious surface coverage9 structure height, provisioxis for placoment of' :I.ots and parki~' grading and f'ill perrnits, vegetation removal starzdards9 PUD standards, substandard 7.ots of recordo i~Ir, Lupe stated that any conditional uses or var9.ances or amendments of shoreland controls would require tha noti~ficatioa~ of the llN$ and wou:Ld have to be approved or certified by tkze DNR. Mr, N3elson cammented that tho City currently does not have a shorelarzd distriat in its Goning Ordinance, The ~lanner suggested Lhat he submit such a c3istrict to the Council and Planning Corruni ssioax to review and then subma.t it to the DNR for their review, Ftondeau & ~'> `~'omaszewski appeared before the Council requesting the da.vision Tomaszowski o£ the itondeau propexty to add five ~eet on to his property, Yropexty Division z°~'~ ~~son ixitroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: FZGSOT,UTION N0. 81-8-1~08 -~ AP:L'itOVING TIIE RONDEAU PROI'IRTY DNISION AS PFtESENTEA ~3Y NIR, TONaASL~~dSKI Page -l0a