09-09-81 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i~dTUUTI~:~ City Counci.~ Septenaber )9 lyBl tIol.zschuh ~ix, Richard ilolzschuh appeared before the Council requesting Council acta.on k'relirn:i.nary on his pre:Lirninary plat> P1.at i~ir, 1~'ahey po9nted out that the l~laraning Gornrna.ssion has not taicen action on the Ho~.zschuh prelimina.r,y plat. Mrs, Nardirzi. inl;roduced the £ollowing resolution and moved its ado~tion; RL'~OLUTIOIQ 'td0. E11_9°~~~~3 - k2;~:MOVING F'tuJNl TAHL~ 7'I?E FIOL'LSCiiU;i PAE;1,Ii~Stdt1RY PL~1~' ~'he foregoixag resolution was dul,y seconded by NIr, x'ahey. elyes (!~) iVardini_9 P'ahey9 I~orsbex~g9 Scalze, Nayes (0). Etesoluti.on dec~ared adopted, 'I'l~is resolution appears in Resolution ~ook No, 7, Yage 302. NLr, f3olzschuh requested tha~ the Council ga.ve ka:im approva_l. For the fix•st seven lots on his pre:t.iminaxy p1at, The CounciL could delay ~ction on the rest o:f the plat un'til the A].len I~venue subjeci: is reso.l.ved, arzd Lhe development o~' the property i.xi the back of the Holzschuh ~a~dperty is settled. i~ir. F~hey pointed out that the, PJ.anning Commission ha.s nof~ given the Cour~cil a x~ecommendation on i~ir. Holzschuh+s pro~osa7~, hir. ElolzschuYx stated that the pa~,1y problems are the A].len tlvenue question and the cross streets in the back property. i~ix•, Holzschuh stated that he does not want to be de7.ayed in sellin~ his p.roperty because of the problems wiCh the back property, i'he Ylax~aer stated tha.t the seven lots £or which i~lr. HoLzschu?~ i~ ~eekang approval are not in questi.orA, Nlr, k'ahey stated that the k'lflnrzin~ Comm~.ssion did a.pprove the :first Ho.lzschuh pr.oposal which prova.ded i'or 75 foot lots. Nr. I~'oxsberg stated that tYae City should not create a p.roblern caith unsa,:Leable propexty, that could be caused by approving the Holzschuh proposal, ~~ir, IIolzschuh replied that if the Counci:L approved 75 foot Lots, there would be a great deal, oF unsalea.ble pxoperty in bac:~ of his property, The Ylanaaer corrunented tha,t the Ci.ty does not norma7.ly allow the development of' an outlot, but in this case it wou:td ber~efit the baclc propertiesa The Ylanner sug~ested that appro'va1 0£ t~ir, 3Iolzsekzuka9s seven lots couJ.d be graa~ted ba.sed uporx approva.l o£ the Planni.n~~ Comrnission. The r;ngineer pointed out that I~ix. IIolzschuh is comarag in with a. proposal that iaa.1L benefit the othex property owxiers in the area, ~he Engineer stated that the approvals requested by irlr, }Iolzschuh are not unreasonabJ.e. The xsngineer also poirited out that Nir. SioJ.zschuh as seeking preliminary pl.at approval a.nd the ~'inal plan ~•ril1. have to show a drainage easemeni: on the rear lot 1.7.nem Yage m1~m