Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />October 28, 1981 <br />Duplex Mrs. Nardini stated that she would like to see the duplex provision in <br />In R-1 an R-1 area removed. <br />Mrs. Scalze commented that people buying property in an R-1 area do not <br />expect rental property in the~r neighborhood. Mr. Hanson commented that <br />people could rent a single family house. <br />Mrs. Nardini stated that she would like a hearing held on this matter <br />or the matter put on a bal7ot. <br />The City Clerk suggested that this could be put in the sewer bills. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that the only reason he is opposed to this being changed <br />is that it would make a lot of homes in the City non-conforming. <br />Fahey stated that he is not convinced that the 1 in 10 provision is bad. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that if the City has this provision, it should be <br />10 in 10 rather than 1 in 10. <br />Mrs. Nardini commented that she will go to the people in various <br />neighborhoods and have them come in to the Council on this. <br />Mr. Hanson stated that if the people came in with a petition on this <br />it would have to be signed by 10% of the people who voted in the general <br />election. Mr. Chlebeck stated that this would be needed to put it to <br />a referrendum. <br />Mrs. Nardini stated that she feels the people should know about this <br />provision. <br />Mr. Forsberg stated that he felt that City had some nice duplexes. <br />6illing Mrs. Nardini pointed out to the Counc9l that the billing that was sent <br />For to a person recently for his use of the City dumpster was $25 rather <br />Dumpster than the $50 the City Council ordered. Mrs. 6lessner informed ~he Council <br />that Mr. Spooner to1d her the bill was to be $25 and after she sent out <br />the bill she noticed from the Council meeting minutes the bill should have <br />been $50. <br />Adjourn Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 81-10-655 - ADJOURNING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Nansqn. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Nanson, Nardini> Scalze, Forsberg. <br />Nayes (0~. Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 425. <br />There being no further business,.the meeting was adjourned at 12:50 A.ht. <br />Respec full submitted, <br />Kathleen Glanzer, ecording Sec tary Page -32- <br />