Laserfiche WebLink
tS]:NUTES <br />City Council <br />December 23~ 198i <br />Park Mrs. Sca7.ze reported that the terms of Lois Runyon~ Carl Spooner arXl <br />Commission Bill Sanders all expire as of December 3~~ 1981 on the Park Commission. <br />Appointments Scalze stated that all three have attended 11 out o f the 12 meetings <br /> that the Commission held. Scalze a1.so stated that she was not in favor <br /> of advertising these positions, <br />Hanson agreed that the positions should not be advertised due to the lack <br />of interest the Council has had in the past when trying to fill Park <br />Connnission vacancies. <br />Scalze reported that all three have reappliea zor the position and £elt <br />that a11 three have done an excellent job for the City. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 81-12-713 - REAPPOTNTING LOIS RUNYON~ CARL <br />SP00 D B LL S NDERS TO THE PARK COMMISSION <br />The foregoing resolution was dul.y seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Hanson~ Nardini~ Forsberg~ Fahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7~ Page 1t81t. <br />Unimproved rir, k'orsberg was concerned about tne City~s issuing building permits <br />Streets on unimproved streets. A'orsberg was concerned about this because of <br />the difficulty to get fire trucks to these homes should the need ever <br />arise. <br />Fahey stated that the Council has allowed this with tne condition that <br />the person be deemed in favor of the street. <br />Forsberg felt that a house should not be bua:lt on an unimproved street <br />until the base is in and the road is graded and it is usable. Fahey <br />commented that he would go along with that. <br />Mrs. Nardini stated that she would research the City Code and see what <br />it says. <br />City Fahey stated that he proposes a January 6 workshop session at which <br />Attorney City Attorney applicants wi11 be interviewed. k'ahey stated that he has <br />Position narrowed the applicants down to three, These are: Sweeny-O~Connor & <br />Leriay, Grannis-Grannis-Campbell & Farrell and Moore-Coste7.lo & Hart. <br />Faney stated that the Clerk has checked on these firms and a11 received <br />excellent recommendati~ons from the other cities they rep~~gent. <br />F'ahey stated that these are the three he recommends and he eliminated <br />the other firms for one reason or another. Fahey also stated that he <br />does not know any of the attorneys in these £irms. <br />Fahey stated that some o£ the reasons he eliminated other £irms was that <br />they did not want to represent the City £or both civil and prosecution <br />woric, or they did not have municipal experience. Also one firm reprsents <br />Maplewood and Fahey £elt conflict of interest situations could develop. <br />Page _3.7- <br />