Laserfiche WebLink
rszrrua~~:s <br />cir.y coU~G~.i <br />M~y a.2, a.9s2 <br />Sign~ The City Clerk zeporCed ~ha~ the City o£ Kosevil7.e wil.k be alloiaxrcg <br />non-conforming s3gns on ~tice Str.eet to be relooated on the same basas <br />Agenda as L•hey are presently non°con£orming. <br />Ltem No. 22 <br />'I'he Clerk regwrCed that ~he Gity o£ Fiaplewood only requests that signs <br />be located t~n feeC away £xom r~.g11t-of°ways. <br />Mr. k'orsberg stated that he sees noth~.ng wxong wi~h what the City oi' <br />Rosevi7.le is doing. <br />The Cler.k reported that the City of Vadnais Heights has vari.ous <br />regulax.ions for signs.. The Clerk reported that Sn di.scussing the <br />situaCion with Yhe Building Xnspectoz and the Planner, they feel <br />the 15 foot setbaclc £or signs irz the City does nn~ woxk and should <br />be changed ~o a S fooC setback. The Clerk suggestsd that the Counci.l <br />ca11 for a public hearing on May 26 to consider amending Y.he Ci.ty~s <br />szgn ordinanoe, The Council should also consider a prov9.sion ChaL- <br />c~ou~.d a11ow the Council to waive variance requir.ements in certain <br />instances. <br />The A~Corney commeraLed that this provision would handle tPae currenC <br />situation in the widenxn~ of Ltiae 5tr~eC. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that he would like to know the Planner~s reasons for <br />x~ecommendin~ the 15 foot setback. Pahey stated that he caould l.ilce <br />input from the Planner on this. <br />The Clerk repa.Yed that the Planner stated that a lot o£ communita,es <br />tzse Che 15 £oot seCback~ however, their Uuildings may be setback 60 <br />feet. <br />Mrs. Nardini commenCed that these ahan~;es cannoC be made in Cime £or <br />the people effec~ed on ftice Stxeet, These signs have Co be reloca4:ecl <br />Chis week. Mrs. 1Vardinf. asked what the Planner~s letter to the businesses <br />along Rice Strset w~~d. <br />The Clerlc replied that the lettex ~old the people Chat each aase would <br />be considered i.nd"avidua7.].y. <br />Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolvtion and moved 'ats adoptions <br />RIiSOL~UTION N0. 82-5-252 - CAI~LING FOR A PUBLIC HL•'A[iING <br />FOR MAY 26' 1982 FOR CONSIUEftATION OF AMENllING THk: SIGN <br />ORDINANCE <br />The forego4,ng resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini.. <br />Ayes (5) For.sberg, Nar.dini, Hanso~x, Scalze, E'ahey. <br />Nayss (0). <br />Resolixtion declared adopted. <br />This resolutian appears in Resolu~ion ~ook No. 8, k'age 202. <br />Pag~ °13- <br />