05-28-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council May 26, 1982 Rental Mr. Delonais stated that at the Planning Commissi.on meeti.ng Sharon Ti.mmons Hall (Cont.) had the feeling thaC this activity was getting too close to the homes in the area. Mrs. ScaLze commented that this area of Little Canada Road is not zoned totally business. Mrs. Scalze commented that everything in the area is R-1. except for Norm's Tires. Mr. Fahey commented tl~at the first~ching the Council must do i.s to decide if it wants to amend the zoning ordinance. Mr. Fahey stated that he does not have a problem with it. The Planner stated thaC he hadsuggested a parking requirement of 1 space for every 24 square feet. Flowever, the Planner staCed that he has reviewed the plans and feels there should be a different parking requirement. The Planner stated that the renCal ha11 would be put to Cwo different types of uses - Reception uses and auditorium us'es. Under an auditorium type of use there should be 1 space for every three seats. Under the reception use there should be 1 space for every 40 square feet. The Planner stated that based on these requirements, the partci.ng should be 1 space for every 40 syuare f.eet and the capacity for auditorium uses should be limited to this par.l<ing availability. Mr. Brinkman informed the Councilthat the site plan he has submitted provides 91 parking spaces. Mrs. Scalze asked if the City had anything f.rom the Water Department on Che parlcing lot overlap of this easement. Mr. Roger Moore reported that the overlap includes a portion of the parking 1ot and a11 of the driveway. Mr. Moor.e statect that if <: proposal were submitted to utilize this, it would probably be acted upon favorably by the Water DeparCment. Mr. Krejci informed the Council that he discussed this with the Water Works Department and it was explained to him that the Department has an easement on Che property and he could not build a structure on it. Mr. Nielson stated that the 91 parking spaces would be a 1~itCle more than adequate, however, if. the additional building were built at the back of the present building, the parking would not be adequaLe. Mr. Fahey stated that he had some question with number 9 of the PLanner's Report dealing with Liquor. The Planner stated that he did not think a liquor license could be issued due to the proximity of the building to the church bu~ilding. The Planner staCed that he does not know what the City's ordinance says about bottle clubs, and suggested thaC the City Attorney research it. The City Cl.erk staCed that it is a State permit process for set-ups, and a Ci.ty process for a wine and beer license. Page -8-