06-23-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES Ci.ty Counci.l. June 23, 1982 Kroiss tir. Pahey stated that he would l.i.ke to matce sure that the City Plat (Cont.) would have no problems wi.th Lot I.. Pahey suggested that per.haps the City should have a buildin~ plan before Che Ci.ty approves Lot l. Mrs. Scal.ce asked how the City could protect i.tself: with regard to Lot l.. Mr. ICroiss commented that in oCher. cit:i.es the I~ui.ldi.ng Inspector Looks aC Lhese thi.ngs. P4r. Forsber.p, aslced if p~.il.ings would be necessary on Lot L Mr. Kroi.ss replied that they woutd not be necessary. Kroiss also indicated thaC he would li.lce to buiLd a single family home on this lot this fall. P1r. Pahey stated that the Council. would have to malce sure Chat all Che engineering was covered on th:i.s lot before ~;ranting f::inal. approval. Mr. Pahey asked if the Council had the right. to deny a f.ill permi.t once i.t has aZ~proved a Lot. The Engineer commented that from Che way Mr. Kroi.ss explai.ned what he was goin~; to do with Lot l, he i.s goin~ to buil.d a house Co fit the lot. Kroiss aslced if the Council would approve the plat wi.t:h 70 feet of. f.ronCa~;e on Lot 4. hr.~. Scalze, Mr. I'ahey and Mr. Porsberg indicated that they would not be in favor of this. Porsber.g commented that there is no hardship present. Kr.oi.ss indicated Chat t~ao owners of the wall could be a hardship. Mrs. Nardi.ni. asked the Planner whaC his recommendation was with regard to the 101- lines. The Planner replied that he had su~gested ~1r. Kroiss strai.ghCen ouC some lot li.nes and Mr. Kroiss has done this. Mr.s. Scalze pointed out to Mr. Kroiss that the way his plaC is set up the wall cuts across three different pi.eces of: property anyway. Kro:iss repl.i.ed that he would like to eli.mi.naCe part of the proUlem if he can. Mrs. Scalze stated that she does not see iC the same cvay Kroiss does, and Scalze further. stated Chat she has not granted vari.ances unl.ess they meeC the City Code. Mrs. Scal-c,e aLso stated that she da.d not thi.nlc Che Ci.ty could le,n,ally restrict Lot 1 to a certain buil.di.n~; plan. Pahey replied thaC the C:i.ty mighC be aUle to say that no builcling permit wi11 be issued unless the City has a sat:isf:actory gradi.ng., ptan. I~ahey commented that he ~oould li.ke some restri.cti.on on Lot 1. Mr. Hanson su~;gested that the Council tabte the maCter unti.l Mr. Kroiss comes baclc with a r.evi.sed plan. Mr. I<r.oiss stated that he would go aLong with Che comments made by the Council with regard to the street fr.ontage f:or Lot 4 and the f.act that Page -~r