09-22-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MI~1tI7'1?5 Ci.ty Counci.l Sepc. 27_, 19F32 SJoodl.yn Ave. T4r. Porsberg commenCed that thi.s plan wc~s not the one the C~ity (Cont.) decided to ca11 a hearing on. Mr. )lerb Dohr. indicated thr:tt the property owners in the area had a meeti.nn on thi.s subject and they have ind:icat:ed that they have no pl.ans for d'zvi.dinn their properti.es. L(r. Dohr i.ndicated that IZ & S told the prooerty owners Y.haC they d:id not even ask f.or a road and only wanted to build an additional bui_1.cLi.ng. Mrs, Scal.ze commentec! that in order to build the building, R<~ S Lvould need a road to get Co i.t. P4r. Porsber~; commented L-hat the type of busi.ness R& S is proposi.ng would add a Lot of traff~.ic to the area. 'Lhe present road would not handle the business. 1?or.sber~ commented tkiat the Counci.l has a responsi.bi.lity to see t1iaC the area ~is developed i.n Che best poss:ible ~oay. Mr. Greg i~(cGough asked who cvill pay for the roads proposed. The En;ineer. repl:ied that Che benefited properties will pay. Mr. llanson commented that the Council f:eels a cer.i:ain responsi.bi.lity to do someChing ~i.n the area f:or safety reasons so that the Ci.ty can ~et in the area in th<~ event of. an emergency. McGough aslced what str.eeC wi.dth i.s be:i.ng pr.oposect. The Png~i.neer repliec9 that a 50 foot rip,ht-of-way is proposed. Mr. 7,,ilge ask~,d Che w9.<lth on the road ~~roposed along the Soo I.ine. The Engi.neer repli.cd that 30 to 40 LeeC is proposed for Chat r.oad. T~Ir. Dohr indi.caCed Chat: there i.s zlseac9y a pri.vate easement, along the railroad, Mr. Dohr. :informer.l the Counci.l that the properCy owners are proposing thatChis easement ~;o to the City and this would ~o through to South Owasso. Mr. I{anson :indicated that there was no easemenC f:or thi.s r.oad on the T9cGou~;h propert.y. Mr. McGou~;h i.ncticated that }ie woul.d gi.ve such an easement. P1r. Fahey stated that thi.s does nor. anscoer the question of. the future development of the area or the buildi.ng that R& S i.s proposin~; Co bui.ld. Fahey stat:ed thaY. an auto parts business cannot be run on a <l:irt road. i4r. ycGough commented that a private road should not be the Ci.ty's Uusi.ness, but R& S's business. Mr.s< >cal•r,e state~d that :i.L becomes the City's nrobl.em if iC precl.udes the CiCy from putt.ing i.n a City coad at a later. date. Mc;Gounh stated that. there are about three busi.nesses wi.th 70% of. the property and they do not want to deveLop, Page -~r~