Laserfiche WebLink
M7NtiCES <br />Ci.ty Counci.l. <br />Sept. ??_, 19£32 <br />SJoodlyn Ave, Mr. Fahey commented that the City cannot al.l.ow R R~ 6 to devalop the <br />(Cont.) back of: i.ts proper.ty without a road. <br />Mr. Dohr pointed out that the City has 33 feet along the Soo I.,:ine for <br />emer;ency access, llohr stated that a road al.ong the 6Jater Works wi.th <br />a cul de sac would serve the R& S property, <br />Mr. 33i11 Gervais inclicated that he has a11 the road needed ~C present <br />and Che bur.den of: a ne~a road tvould be i.mpossible for hi.m. <br />'t'he Pngineer indi.cated that the Water Works di.d not wane any f9.7.1in~; <br />i.nto theis property. Therefore, reta~i.n:ing wal.ls would have lo be <br />bu:i.lt. to hold up the street Chat was previ_ously discussed <br />adjacent i:o the R& S property. The Png~i.neer f:elt that this caould <br />be a danger.ou, si.tuati.on. <br />P9r. 71.1ge commented C.hat most businesses :i.n the C~.ity have one access <br />and questioned why thi.s area needed more. <br />~ir. Pahey poinCed out that the road through the Gervais property <br />woulc.l be a very l.ong cul de sac. Pahey also commented that a 33 foot <br />road i.n an industr.i.al area i.s noL adequ2te. <br />Mr. Flanson commented that in order. to issue a bui.lding permit <br />Lor Che pr.oposed business, under the Ci.ty's or.di.nance t:here must be <br />a street. <br />Y4r. 7,i.l.ge commented thaC he nave the City an ~asmeenC Lor a road. <br />Mr.s. Nardi.ni. commenred that part of. Che easemenC is where the brown <br />bu:i.ldi.ng on the R& S property :is I.ocaCed. Mr. '/.ilge repli.ect tl~at <br />the C~ity should have done its homewor.k and di.scovered thaC. <br />Mrs. Nardini statecl that she ciid not think the City could force the <br />thor.oughfare pl.an on the businesses, but Chat R& S coulcl not bui.ld <br />witi~out a road. <br />The Pl.anner poi.nCed ouc. that Che thoroughfare pl.an may never come <br />abouC and the plan is to base ttie Cit.y's judgrnenC on what R t4 S is <br />proposin~< <br />Mr. Pahey st<atecl that I~e ].:ilced the proposal. alonp., tk~e Soo Line. <br />A member of the audi_ence as;cecl how wi.de the ~avement. needed to be <br />along the Soo Li.ne. The I;ngineer repli.ed 30 feet. It caas asl<ect <br />cohy a 50 fooC r.:i.ght-of:-way caas needed for 30 feet of pavement. <br />The I;ngi.neer replied Chat the additi.onal. foota¢;e i.s needed on <br />Che boul.evards Lor snow removat. Mr. 1?ahey sta[ed that the City <br />should have 60 f:eeC of right-of:-way but would Ue o~il.linp to li.ve <br />wi.tlt 50. <br />IC was pointed out thaC the Soo Li.ne easement is 100 Leet wide <br />and that there caould be room Eor snow storage on thi.s easement. <br />Vane -5- <br />