My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-82 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
09-22-82 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:18:07 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MI~iJ'PPS <br />City Council <br />Sept:. 22, 1987 <br />[doodtyn Ave <br />(Cont.) <br />A member of, the audi,ence astced where the water would go. The <br />Engineer. repl.i.ec.l thaC the dr.ainage would Ue ti.ed in partly wi.th <br />South Owasso and partly with idoodiyn. <br />Mr. 1?orsbc~~rg commented that he was not i.n favor oF assess:ing these <br />people for somethi.ng, they do not need and w~i.11 not benefi.t by. <br />Lir. Gervai.s a,lced ~if i.t has been consi.derc~~d r~.inning Gdoodlyn i.nto <br />Spruce Street. <br />Mr. 7iLne aslced if. it would not be more proper placi_n~; the sewer <br />where the roact would run, The Png:ineer repli.ed Chat Che sewer does <br />not necessari_ly have to go where the street i.s. <br />Nrs. Nard:i.ni. inclicated that the di.scussi.on *aas geCti.ng away from <br />the issue and ChaC i.s the 2 R. S devel.opment. Nardi.ni. aslced i.f. tx~e <br />road could run beCween the R& S property and the 7.il.ge properCy. <br />Mr. 7.i1ge replicd [hat it would be a hardship to hi.m f:or the road <br />to r.un i.n thaC 7.ocati.on because ot h:i.s loading docl<. <br />Mrs. Nardi.nz stated that she d:i.d not see any way that the road <br />coul.d b~ put ~i.n and ~ bui.ldi.ng permi.t :i.ssued Co P. & S. <br />Mr. Pak~ey stated that R<4: S can pay a12.i,000 to puC the corner in. <br />L'ahey stated that he feels the Ci.ty should worlc to~aards ~etting <br />the. easements a1on~; the Soo Line. <br />Mr. 'l,i.l,ge aslced why Che si.tuation cannot remai.n as :i.s. Lilge stated <br />thaC l.he businesses i.n tl~e area are happy wi.th the sit:uati.on. Lil.ge <br />i.nd:icated Ctiat i.t i.s an industrial parlc. Mrs. Scalz.e replied Chat <br />thi.s :i.s the reason the road is needed. <br />Mr. Porsber.g statect ehaL a lot of additi_onal customers wil.1 be coming <br />i.nto the area. A member of the audience staCed Chat it would be R& <br />S's problem to worry abouC their customers and :i.f. they ~vere tlappy <br />with road access. <br />Mr. I~lanson staCed that the City necds another way in to serve the whole <br />area. lianson commented that Che easement along the Soo Line ~viLL not <br />pec bactc to the R& S property. The easement i.dea is ~;ood, but the <br />easemenC mtist be maintai.ned. <br />Mrs. Narcii.ni. stated that the Counci.l. wi.l.l. grant the permit iF R R< S <br />wants to pay for the ~1.25,000 corner. <br />Mr. Dohr i_ndi.cated that Che auCO parts bus:i.ness can sti.11 be done <br />i.[ the C~oo pr.operti.es are combi.ned. Dohr indi-cated ChaY_ under the <br />circumstances R& S had no ct~oice but to comb:i.ne the proPerti.es. <br />P1r. Pahey aF;reed thaC i.t. was thei.r onlq alternative. Pahey also <br />commented that he f:e].t the Ci_ty shoul.d have a 50 fooC ea~sement a~l.on~; <br />the rai.lroad. <br />Page -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.