Laserfiche WebLink
raT~itrcn;s <br />City Cotmc~il. <br />Sept. 29, 1982 <br />;Ytr. Ga~ne strzted ChaC there *,oere r.tbout £32 nermi.CS taken out so far <br />this year ~nd on7.y 19 of. these wer.e Lor over :~500. Mr. Gagne <br />stated that he Felt t:he Ci.ty had coo mucli inspecti.on. <br />2~[r. Hanson asfced cahat <br />macle for i.mprovements <br />that the U73C requ:i.rFs <br />$500 but other Ch:i.ngs <br />a bui.l.cli.no :Ls beinf; c <br />comrnented that th:are are ~~ small. group of people in Che Ci.ty <br />malcin~ co!npla:i.nts aboi.it something that: the C;ity should have had <br />For a 1on; t~me. <br />t:he Code sai.cl, <br />over $500. The <br />inspecti.ons Lor <br />as well.. ;?or e <br />~an;ed. <br />If. an :inspec[:i.on had to be <br />Bu~.ilcling Scsnec[or statecl <br />not only irnprovements over <br />Kampl.e, iE the structure of <br />Mr. 1'ahey stated Ci~at he <li.d not. ui~iderst~vnd Che probl.ein. L~akiey <br />I'orsberg stated that <br />7~orsberg poi.nted out <br />week to f:or.ty hours. <br />:i.s doin; other inspe <br />h:i.s cornplai.nt. i.s wi.th the amount of ti.me. <br />that the Ci.ty o~ent f.rom f.our hours prr <br />i4rs. Diardini poinGed ouC th~it Che Inspector <br />~Cions in aclclition to bua.ldi.ng inspect~ion. <br />Mrs. Scalze cominented Chat rdr. I'orsberg wanted a Fise Marshall <br />and t:he Ci.Cy wanted an i.nspecCOr two to three days a yoeef< coi.thout <br />Che fi.re ~inspect:ion du[ies. Scal.ze also poi.nted out that before <br />thea T3ui1.cl~i.ng ~[ns~>ector Che Counci_1, was sitC~i.ng ~t meet~i.n~;s until <br />2 or 3 o'cl.ock in the morning handli.n~ ].ega1. problems and enforce- <br />mene problems. T~Ir,. Scalee fel.t tt~~t her enforcement duties have <br />been cuC down by Che additi.pn ot the I3ui.ld.ing InspecCOr Pull-time. <br />Scalze nl.so stated th~L :in tl~e past the C'i.ty sent ttie Attorney <br />o~.tC to do code entorcement. <br />Tk~e C:LCy Clerlc po~i.nte<i out that N[r. I..ocl<e is also do:ing pl.umbi,ng <br />and heati_n~ i.nspections. Tkie Clerl,c felt that the most i.mportant <br />job atr. Lodce is performi.ng, -Ls the code enforcement. In Che <br />>ast the City also used the Planner and Sheri.f:I to do thi.s job. <br />Kr. Pahey stated that he was not prepare<t Co chan€;e hi.s posi.t:i.on. <br />F'ahcy srated that Clie C.Cey neecls Che ~os~LCion as f.ul.l-tirne. <br />Mrs< Plardi.ni. aslced if the Counci.l was goi.np, <br />of the employees i.n 1n overal7. paclca;e. i~~i~r. <br />the Counc:il. determine an average sal.ary and <br />increase amount ~o it. Mr. Nanso^ slated <br />to ~enal.i.ze those empLoyees wiCh the hi;7lest <br />su~~eseed that perh~ips the City irnplement so <br />pro~ram. <br />to consider the salari.e> <br />I-lanson suYgested that <br />they appl.y a dollar <br />th~.~t he di.d noC we~nc <br />s~alarie>. Hanson <br />~ne sort of incentive <br />~r, Pat~ey stated t11at ltc di.sa~;reed caitl~~ thi., approach as each posi.ti.on <br />is uni.qu~. Mr. I~'ahey stated that }ic did noC tiiinl: the hi.gl~er pa:id <br />employees shoulcl be penal.i.zed i.n terrns o[ ;~ ~~>ercenCage ~.i.ncrea>e because <br />they had more responsibi.l-ity. Pahey suggestecl Che Coui~ic~i1 l.ook at <br />the lncli.vidiial. job. rahey also suflgested that Dan Draice and Joe SteeJ.e <br />be i.ncreased to a l.evel of what other. posiCi.ons i.n oCher c~ities are <br />recei.v:i.ng. <br />Pa~;e -].0- <br />