Laserfiche WebLink
r-~rrnrrrs <br />c~.ty c~un~;.~. <br />Sept. 29, 19£32 <br />)'-,raployee <br />Salaries <br />(Cont.) <br />~Tr. 1-ianson :i.ritroduced t_he 'f:ollowinc; resolut:i.on and moved ~i.ts adopt:i.on: <br />RTSOLU'I".ION N0. 82-9-4~7 - A?>PROV-LNG A 7 <br />PP.,P.CIiN'C SALA2Y N~. CP,1's~SF 'CO JOSIiPII CHLti;13F;CtC, <br />nNNE'CTE I~tiE};TdAN, ROG)iR GLnN'LEJ: AND ED I.,OCKE AND <br />A~150.00 PrSt NION'I'1! S~LARY IAICREA;E 9'0 D~N Di2A1'.1: <br />AND .TOI; STG~?I,E L'.PFEC7'LVL' ,JANAURY 1., 19f39 AND <br />DI;CI~ARI~'G THA'C T1~1P C"L7'Y IN MAY, 19~i3 WII,L R~iVIEW <br />'f.l-U~: COST OT' I,T9`t.NG ;TA7'lJS AND US7Z THI;IR J)ISCRZ'f,IODi <br />IN 'C;~IF. TR}?A'l'httf:N'C OI' TI~tF;SF, E~ll?J,OYI?PS <br />The foregoin~ resoluCion was duly seconded by p1r, I'orsberg. <br />Ayes (~~) Hanson, F~'or.sber~, Scal.ze, Nardi.n:i.. <br />\~yes (1) Pahey, <br />Ite,oluti.on decl.ared a<lop[ed. <br />Thi.s re,olution appears i.n r~esolue~i_on I3oolc No. ~S, k'ahe !441 <br />t~[r. l~lanson recomrnended Cha[ the Councll ~~ive a little lar.ger i.ncr.ease <br />to the two par.t-time office employees< <br />Mr.. F'nhey commented Cktat: it wss nood to consider Each posit:ion <br />indl.vi.duzilly. f~towever, rahey fei.t that i.f th:i.s holcls Crue Yor t.he <br />p~rt-ti.me ~mployecs, i_t should 1~o1d true for the Fu7.1-time enip7.oyees. <br />P9r. 1'~shey stated thaG he woulci be wi1l:i.n~ to support P~,[r. Han,on's <br />recommendlt:ion £or the part-time emp7.oyees i.f the Cotmcil would <br />recons.ider their acC:i.on witli re~;ard to Che fu7.7.-ti_me employees. <br />Mr, Y-lanson poiriCed ou[ that the part-time ertiployees arc, recei.ving <br />no fri.n~;e benef:i.ts. <br />Nirs, Scalze comrnented Chat i.f: t:he City were to replzice the two <br />part-tirne o,Efzce worl<ers w:i.th a full.-ti.me posit~i.on, the City <br />coul.d not ~et. a combinat:i.on secretary and computer oper~itor. <br />Mr. P'orsherg aslced why the City had two parl;-tirne peoE~le rather th~n <br />onc Lu11-Cime per.son, Mrs. I~reeman connnenCed Chat it tvould cost Che <br />Ci_ty ~eCween ~5,000 and $b,000 per year in bene.~P~i.es for a~Ltill.-t~ime <br />n8YS011. <br />iQrs. Nard:ini sta~ed that she would 1.ilce to see thF Cwo p~rf-elme c~ff:ice <br />wor'<ex> recei.ve a 7% increasc plus vacat:ion, sick ].eave tind hol.iday <br />benef.~,its on a 3/Stti's basis. <br />Mrs. D1ard:i.n;i. introduced Ctie f.ollowi.ng resolut~ion and move.d -i.ts adoption: <br />7.213SOLUTIOn N0. 82-9-493 - AppROVING A 7% SAI.ARY <br />I\CiZL:ASP FOi2 GRt~CF, ~3LFSS\~R A'VD B;;VE'2I,Y ,7fiSPERSP~I <br />AND AT.,SO AYPROVING A 3/5Tk?'S VACATION, SSCIC L~,AVL: <br />AND ilOL,IDAY pny BfsNf'srITS P~CKAGl3 F?(~PF.CTIVIs 1/1/S3 <br />Page -13- <br />