Laserfiche WebLink
'•17.PI1JT1: i <br />C~.i.C:y Counci.l. <br />Sept. 29, 193'L <br />Llmployee 'Chc Ci.ty Clerk k~oi.nCed out t:h~t eventualJ.y th~ City will have Co <br />Salaries adopC a personnel. ord_inance. <br />(Cont.) <br />L4r.. T~a1~eq commente~d Chat he feel.s Dan ~nd Joe's salary i, way low <br />and chat thcy should recei.ve a";1.50 per month i.ncrease. <br />Mr. Glanzer po~int~-~d out thc~at i.n the Publi.c ilorics Department <br />tl~iere ar~~~ oCher positions he must. perform i.n add-Lt:i.on to the <br />Superintendent posiCi.on. G1,~nzer commented that other Cities <br />have a Publi.c Wortcs Director, wni.ch Litl'l.e Canadri does not. <br />;1r< fahey stlted that he leans t;owards a sm111 sta£f for the Ci.ty, <br />Gl.anzcr commented that the Pub7.~Lc Works nepartment probab].y does <br />mor.e work than s:i.mi7.ar deparGments ~.in oChe~r citi.es wiCh larger <br />crea~s. Glanzer also st:ated thaC ehe staff pi.~ts in a loC ot exCr.a <br />ti.me. <br />~lr. 7'orsberg aslced :i.f other cit;_es g~i.vc their ~mployees comp time. <br />Gl.anzer repl.i.ed that some do anci some don't. <br />Mr, Fahey stated t1~at he was not opposed Co an ii% :i.ncrease if <br />t:.he necessary vot_es G~ere [}.~ere. 'Che C:i.ty C1ert< cornmented that Che <br />utate and County _is consideri.nf; 7%. Mr. Pahey pointed out that the <br />State and Countq ~~lso ~rovide f.or a cost oE living incr~~;ase. <br />P4rs. Scalze stated Chat she ha, done sorne research and permanent <br />part-Ci.me peoPle generally rece~ive benaE~it:s if t.hey wor.lc at 1er:ist <br />20 hours. The benef~i.ts are usually ha1.f of a Eull.-ti.me employees <br />bene.fits. N[r. tahey repl.:ied thc~C I~~e .fe1.t they st~ould receive <br />3/St:h's benefits as t:laey woek 3/St.li's of a f.ul1-[ime pos~Leion. <br />Mrs. Nardini suf;pested Chat Dan pralce and Joe Steele rece~ive a~150 <br />per month incr.ease and Che remaining fu11-Y.i.me emp7.oyee> recei.ve a <br />7%, increase. <br />P4r. Gl.anzer commented tV1at Che Counci.l. oroul.ci only be ;iv;ing the <br />employees a cost-of--].ivi.n~ lncrease and not tzatc.i.ng anyf:hing e~l.se <br />i.nto conside~raCion. Gl.anzer commented that thie salari.es are <br />cur.renCly not. up to what other cit:i.es are payin~ their personncl. <br />Glanzer fe1C these salari.es were at least a year beh:i.n~l other cities. <br />Mr. :i~ahey statecl tk~at he adreed. }~~hey Ee1t :if 7% were „rant_ed tl~ie <br />CiCy shoulrJ also provide for a cost of. livinp., i.ncrease. ~ahey <br />stated that he c•roul.d 1,ilce to see an 8% increase aai.[h a cost of <br />l;i.ving ~»rov~i_s:i.on. <br />NSr. P'ahey commented that the sal.arics are a sma11 portion o'f the overail.l <br />budgeC. T'ahey pointed our, that iC i.s the em~loyees who do Che cvoik <br />~in tl~e city ~nd run the Ci.ty d.ur.ing the d~,y, i'ai,ey then commented Chat <br />perhaps the Ci.ty ehouid consid.er a L1.at percent~~;e inerease as a <br />cosC of ].i.vi.ng prov:i.s:i_on coul<1 cosC ttie C:i.ty a lot of money. <br />Pcige -12- <br />