Laserfiche WebLink
rir?au•rrs <br /><;ity Counci.7. <br />Sept. 29, 1.9(32 <br />Revenue 'Che for.enoi.ng resolut:i.on was dul.y seconded by ~Irs, Nar<li.ni.. <br />Shar.ing ~,yes (i) Fahey, Nardi.n~i, J~lanson, Scalze, Por.sber.~;. <br />(Cont.) N?yes (0). <br />i?esol.utivn declared ado~ted. <br />'Chi. , resol.uti.on appears in P,esolution ~ook \o. ~3, Page 43/F. <br />1983 I3udget '1'he CiCy Clerk submitted to the Counci7. a copy of a letter. d~nted <br />' 'ep tember. 27 f:r.om the Ci.ty's Auditor. r.egarcli_n~; Che 1983 budnet< <br />Attorney <br />s <br /> In thi.s ].eT.t~r the Audi.tor. is recomm<:nd:ing that thc City levy <br />]?res <br /> its fu11 limit. 'I'hey ar.e recommendi.ng a tax levy o £ ;$409,995 <br /> and a bond levy oL 5697,300, <br />Agenda <br />~.Ctem No. 4- <br /> ~~ir. ltanson asked the Counc~il's ,Feel.ings on levq:i.ng its f:u11 l:imi_t. <br /> Han son pointF;d ouC CL1at the Cit.y o~f Vadnais Ple:iohts did not: levy <br /> the fu11 arnount. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked if the 19£34 tax levy wouLd bc based on what Che <br />Ci_ty ].evies ~in 1933. Scalze also ais)ceel ~i.f the levq limit~Ci.on is <br />based on a c;i.ty's valuati.on. <br />'Clie City Clertc re~li.ed Chat the J.evy in previous yeacs has been <br />baised on va7.uation plus the :i_ncome of: the Ci.ty pl.us wl~at: the C:iCy <br />has 1evi.ed i.n prev:ious years. The C1er1< commenCed that i.t :i.s a <br />very compl.i.cated Lormula. <br />P4r. l~lanson po~.inted out thai[: the School. Distr~.ict i.s i.nereasin~; tPie~i.r <br />I.evq over four mills anci su~;n~seed thaL- the City Cry for a decrense. <br />~4rs. Dlardi.ni. questioned whether or. not tl~e Cit:y woul.d put i.tself ,i.n <br />a b~ind by not 1.evyin9 its full amount. <br />~lr,. Scalze ast<ed iE loccal. government ai.ds i.s based on the amount <br />lev~.iee!< The City C1er.lc r.epli.ed thttt i.f. the City does noC l.evy iLs <br />].i.mi_t, 1oca1 government a~i.ds would be decreased. <br />;~[rs. Scalze commenCed Chat as a responsible Cowzcil, the Cotmc:il should <br />fol.l.ow tlie aud:i.tor's recommendati.on and levy ~i.Y.s l.i.mite <br />P1r. 1-tanson stated that i.f che C~i.ty 1.evies i.ts 1~t.miC~ it shoul.cl put <br />more money into reserv<~~. 'r4r.s. Nard~i.ni. state<1 that she anreed. <br />Scalze poi.nted out Chzit the Audi.tor has determi.ned thaC i.f the City <br />levi.es it:, ].imi.t, the m:f.11. rate would be loroer than last year< <br />Lr. Hanson sug~ested Chat Che fir,t area of the bud.pet to be consi.dered <br />would `ue [he Attorney fees for 19E33. <br />The City ~ttorney commented that. wi.tlt tkte excepti.on of: the civil and <br />crS.m:i.nal. retai.ners, Che rest of Che fees ~1re es[imates of what is <br />Page -2- <br />