Laserfiche WebLink
MINIJTT?S <br />C~iCy Council. <br />Nov. 24, 1982 <br />7.983 Fng:i.neeri.ng <br />Contract The City <br />as those <br />Ap,enda <br />Item No. 9 Tlte City <br />wi.ttt t}te <br />shoa~ld b <br />Cl.erlc reported that the 1982 enginerring fees are the same <br />proposed i.n the 19f33 engi.neeri_n~; contract. <br />Attorney su{;gestecl that the engineering contract ~i.s :i.n order <br />excepti.on of on page 4, L-hird paragraph the word "way" <br />__ substitutect for the word "any". <br />P1rs. Scalze incroduced the fol.lowi.ng resol.ution arid moved its adoption: <br />RPSOLUTION N0. 8?_-11-596 - APPi30VING TIlE <br />1983 ENGZNEERING CON'L'RACT WTTH THP; CORR£CTIOD7 <br />AS OUTI.INED T3Y THE CITY ATTORNPY <br />The foregoing resol.ut:ion was duly seconded b;• Mr.s. Nard:in:i.. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Nardi.ni, Porsberg, Fahey, l~lanson. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resol.uti.on declared adopted. <br />'Lhis resolution appears in ResoJ.uti.on I~oolc N0. 8, Pap,e 600. <br />Plameburger The City Pngineer submi.Cted to the Council a prof:ile that he did o£ <br />the Pl.ameburger property. <br />Non-Agenda <br />Item No. 1 Mr. Forsberg reported that Che parlcing 1ot has been blackLOpped. <br />Mr.s. Scalze stated that there are no curbs around the partcin~; lot. <br />Mr. Forsber~; aslced the w:idth of the swail. The lsnp,ineer replied <br />that the easement i.s ten f.eet and the swait i_s wi.thin Chat easement. <br />The Iing:i.neer estimated that actual si.ze of. the swai.l to be fi.ve <br />f:eet:. Mr. Porsber~; commented that he f.e1t the swail should cover <br />the entire easement. <br />'Che Pngi.neer stated that when the storm sewer is completecl on }?ark <br />Street, there ~oill be an outlet for the Anderson property. There is <br />also a ponding, area located on the north side of the Anderson pr.operty. <br />The ];ngineer stated Chat the plan calls f.or Ulactctop curbs. <br />7'wi.n Lalce The Ci.ty Attorney reported thaC the abstract f.or T.he '.Cwin La(ce <br />f11vd. Property 131vd. Property i.ndicates an outstandi.n~ mortgage a~;ainst this <br />property and the mortgagee will not release the property. There <br />Agenda are also abouC $360,000 in judgements against Mobil America. <br />Item No. 11 <br />The At[orney reporCed that he Leels he ~ai11 be able to exti.np;uish <br />these cLai.ms a~;ai.nst the property. However, Chere i.s some ri.stc <br />:i.nvolved i.n payi.ng the County $30,000 for the property and getCing <br />a conveyance to the City. <br />The At.torney suggested that the City could bring a quiet hi.tle <br />action, however, the County in<licated that Chey wi.ll not ~i.ve <br />the Ci_ty an appointment to do thi.s. Or the City can request <br />that the property be conveyed to Che Ci.ty by SCate llse Deed and <br />then Y.he C:ity can bri.ng the Qui.et Ti.tle Action. <br />nac±e -1.5- <br />