My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-82 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
11-24-82 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:18:57 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Ci.ty Council <br />Nov. 24, 1982 <br />SL~n Ordinance ORDINANCE N0. 199 - AM~NDING SPCTION 903.1.10 <br />(Cont.) P..S.a. AND b. INCREASING TIiE AMOUNT OF <br />ALLOWAIiLE SIGNAGE IN 'SI{g "~3-2" TIIROUGI{ "]3-W" <br />AND "I-1" 7,ONING DISTRIC7'S <br />'C]ie forePoi.ng ordinance was duly seconded by Mr.s. Nar.dini. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Nardini, Scalze, Por.sberg, Hanson. <br />N1yes (0). <br />Ordinance decl.ared adopted. <br />Water.mai.n The City has receivecl a petition for watermain for County Road D <br />Peti.~i.on f.rom Payne Avenue to the east 1ot line oL Lot F3, Aud. Sub. 43. <br />C~.unty Road D . <br />Mrs. Narctini aslced iI t:he Ci.ty should be consi.dering loolcing at <br />Agenda water Lor. more of Chis area. <br />Item N0. 8 <br />'Phe Engineer repli.ed that he will. br:ing back the feasibi.lity <br />report in tcao Eorms. The first wi11 be for just what was requested~ <br />and the second wi11 include watermai.n all the way to Arcade and <br />for the Sylvan Addition and perhaps even Greenbr~ier from County <br />Road D to LaBore. <br />Mr. Ilanson asked if. tlte City should consider watermain from Arcade <br />to LaBore on County Road D. <br />Mrs. Nardin:i poi.nted out that the more Chal- is done the betCer the <br />price will be for everyone. <br />T4rs. Scalze sug~ested that when the feasibility report is done the <br />section requested by the developer be 1<ept separate as the City <br />should assess this portion at 100%. <br />'Che ~ngineer. stated Chat he cvill show the f.igures both ways. <br />Mrs. Scalze i.ntroduced the following resolution anct moved its adoption: <br />RPSOLUTION N0. 82-11-593 - <br />RET'i3RRZNG 'I'IIP; COUNTY ROAD D WATERMAIN <br />PFTI'CION TO TH~ CITY ENGINEI;R T'OR ADL'QiJACY <br />AND PEASIfIILITY <br />The f.oregoing r.esolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. <br />Ayes (5) ScaLze, Nardini, Hanson, Porsber~;, Pahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution de.clared adopted. <br />Thi.s resolut:ion appears in Resolution J3ook No. 8, Page 597. <br />Page -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.