Laserfiche WebLink
rizNU~rrs <br />c~.cy cou„~;.i <br />I'eb. 9, 1953 <br />Amusement Mrs. Scalze stated that she did not want all the ~;ame rooms to come <br />Center Ord. to I.ittle Canada because the Ci ty was the least restrictive and <br />(Cont.) expensive of. other. citi.e s. P1r. Stri.ml:i.ng replied that the game rooms <br /> wi11 have to be able to support themselves. <br />Mr. Forsber.g introduced the f.ollowi.ng ordi.nance and moved i.ts adopti.on: <br />ORDINANCE ~0. 202 - AN OI2DINANCE AMENDING <br />CHAP7'FR 811, GAME R.OOMS, OF TtIP P1l1NICIPAL <br />CODP; OI' TftE CITX OP LI'CTLE CANADA, RI:GULATLNG <br />AMUSPMZNT C~NT1'sRS AN1,) SUA,7~CT TO Tl9E TWO <br />AMI3NDM~NTS AS OUTLINPD BY TH~ COUNCIL REGARDING <br />THE AGP OP 16 AND TI-IE HOIIRS OP OPFRAT,ION <br />13EGINNING AT 7 A.M. <br />The foregoi.np, orcii.nance was duly seconded by Mr.. Pahey. <br />Ayes (4) Porsberg, Pahey, Nardini, Scalze. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Ordinance declared adopted. <br />Pili.ng F'orms Mrs. P]ardini aslced if: the criminal penalty >tated on the filin{; forms was <br />Por Vari.ances, go:ing Co be enf.orceable. The City Attorney replied that it would not. <br />Condi.tional Use The Attorney commented that this was of no va].ue on the f.i.li.ng <br />Permits [orm and asl<ed if the Council wanted this out ;.n rhe ordi.nance. <br />Agenda Mr. i'ahey aslced i£ the c:ity had anything i.n the ordi.nance that says <br />Item No. 6 a violati.on o[ the zoning ordinance is a criminal. misdemeanor. The <br />Attorney replied that the City had this, but it di.d not apply to <br />a vari.ance, <br />Pahey aslced i.f the C~.ity shoulci put this in the ordi_nance, or leave <br />it out and revoke a variance if necessary. <br />The Attorney stated that a variance could be revolced if. someone went <br />beyond the vari.ance. 'The City would have to ~o to court in this <br />i.nstance. <br />The Attorney r.eported that the Itamsey Count_y Recorder has not yet <br />addressed the S.ssue of unif.orm filinp, forms. The At[orney scated <br />Chat the f.orms before the Counci.l are the recommendation of the <br />Ci.ty Planner. The Attorney sug~ested that he verify with the Recorder's <br />Of.f.ice that these forms would be acceptable to them. <br />Mr. Pahey suggested that before the Attorney verify the forms, the <br />Council stri.lce paragraph 5 f.rom the forms. <br />Mrs. Scalze aslced the City Clerk if the term Special Use Permi.t has <br />been eliminated, The Ci.[y Clerk stated that thi.s was correct. <br />Scalze commented that then everything was cal.led a condi.Ci.onal use <br />per.mit. Mrs. Scalze asked if condi.ti.ons could be added at a later date< <br />Page -4- <br />