Laserfiche WebLink
MINtt'CES <br />C:ity Counci.l <br />P'eb. 22, 1983 <br />Tr.affi.c Signal. <br />(Cont.) The Ci.ty Clerk pointed out t}tat Roseville 1.Zas i.ndicated that ~i.L they <br />parti.cipate i.n the cost, they wil.l assess the property owners for the <br />cost. <br />Mr. Newman stated that he would Ue agreeable to thi.s. Newman asl<ed <br />i.f the whole thing could be assessed, or. just the City's porti.on. <br />ilr. Dle~aman stated that there woul.d be no compla:i.nt on this from <br />the Schroeder property and he would lm ow by Fri.day how MacDonald's <br />feels about i.t. <br />T4rs. Scalze aslced what Mr. Newman Lel.t woul.d <br />Mr. Newman stated tYiat he would be agreeable <br />nei.ghbor.hood ot assessi.ng CUI) for 2/3rd's ot <br />Canada Mall. and P9ac~onald's each being asses <br />stated that i.f. Champlin were i.nvol.ved, than <br />?/3rd's and the rema:i.ni.ng tk~ree at somethi.ng <br />or a 40-40-20 spli.t of. the, remai.nder. <br />be a f:air lssessmenC, <br />to something in the <br />T.he cost and Littl.e <br />~ed 1/6th. Ne~aman <br />Cub shoulcl r.emain at. <br />l.i.ke a 1./9th assessmenY <br />Mr. Voto, the Ci.ty Auditor suggested Chat i.f the cost of: the si.gnal i.s <br />assessed, the City shoul.d get an a~reement that the merchants are <br />agreeable to the assessment and will not protest i.r.. Mr. Voto stateci <br />that tk~ere can be no construct:i.on on that riflht-of-way ~nless i.t i.s <br />the State or the Cit:y. <br />Mr. k[anson commented that there i.s a p~iece of proper.ty on the end of <br />Mi.nnesota that ~i.s usc~~d as residential. that would probably get out of: <br />an assessment. If t:he property were sold as commercial~ thi.s would <br />not Ue f:air. <br />Mr. Porsber.g stated that he di.d not thinl< that the City's not partici- <br />pating would sCOp the merchants from putti.ng in the si~nal. <br />I~'ire Trucl< Mr, Voto r.eported that he t~as lool<e<i i.nto t:he fznancing of. $140,000 <br />And Senior as tlie Ci.ty's commitment for senior citi.zen itousin~. <br />Citizen <br />ttousing Mr. Voto poi.nted out that the City has $45,000 in the Pi.re Department <br /> Truclc Puncl throup,h 19£33. Mr. Vot:o suggest:ed that the $45, 000 Ue put <br /> to~aards the senior. ci.tizen ho using and the City then bond Lor the <br /> fu11 cost of the f.i.re truclc. <br />~r., Voto prepared a report on thi.s proposal. ancl proceeded to go Chrough <br />ir. w;.th the Counci.l. ( Exhibit-A-) <br />Mr. Voto commented that he did not recommend usi.ng the Utility Funds <br />for the fi.nanc:ing of t_he senior citizen hous:ing. Voto stated that the <br />funci has $1.'L0,000 balance, but the @4[dCC recently increased its charges <br />from $h0,000 to $90~000. <br />Page -5- <br />