02-23-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MiNIJTPS Ci.ty Council 1.'eb< 23, ].983 Waterma:i.n A member of the audience asked if the watermai.n could be put on the Hear:i.ngs (Cont ) ri.j;ht-of:-way rather than tear.i.n; up r.he s[reeC, 'f.he Eng:i.neer repl.i.ed h . t at i.n that case the ro~d would have t:o be burr.owed i.inder and Che Ci.ty would st:i.1.1 Yiave. the cost of replacing sod and dr:i.veways. The F.ngi.neer reported that he considered this alterna[i ve but f:el t it . , . wouldcost at least .~,~1.,500 per home. A member of the aurli.ence commented that t.he $30.00 price w~.is dependent upon all. the ~rojecr_s being approveci. Tl~~e Engi.neer suggest~d tltat the heari.ng on the Dianna Lane project could be continued until it :i.s determi.ned if the other projectswi.l.1 be approved. i4r, I'ahey stated that kie *aas not: i.n f.avor of putting in a s-i.ngle street at a cost; of: ~4£3.00 per front. foot. Mr. LeNfay aslced ~if the road installation for Dianna Lane was inc:luded i.n the tota7. of. a1.1. the projects. The Engineer repli_ecI [:hat 1t coas. !4r. LeMay asiced :if thi.s ~aas proposed f.or. al.l the :improvements. 7'he Engineer repl.ied that: Greenbri.er Street is proposeci for a new mat. 'Che other stree[s be:i.ng considered are Cotuity streets and the i.mprovement must go in ori the boulevard and not the street. '1.'he rng:i.neer reported that i.n the case o[ County roads the dr:iveways and sod wi11 l~ave to be restored. Mr. I.eMay stated thaC he did not: £eel everyone else shoulcl have to pay for th~ cosl: o[ a new ,treet f.or D:i.anna Lane. Mr. T'ahey stated that t:he reason thait thi, is be.i.ng consi.dered is ,o t:hat :i.t can be discussed toni;ht. The Ci.ty can <lel.ete i.t i.f that i.s o~hat is desired. t4r.. LeMay stated that jusC the cost of the waterma~.in shoulcl be included and not the street a1so. Mrs< ivardini. poi.nted out:. that. the people on County Road B-2 w},io rece~i.ved watermai.n in 7.9fl2 along w].th 1Zi.ce Street: }iad t:o ~ay for the new pavlna of Ri.ce Street. Nardi.n~i. po:i.nted out that: on].y one side of P.i.ce Street coul.d have been assessed, anci, therefore, ~it wa, benefi.cial. to t:i.e this projecC i.n wi.th ot:hers i.n t:he Ci.ty. A member of tlte audi.ence. reported t:hat when r.he devel.oper put in ni.anna Lane, he ~vanted to put i.n a dry waterl.i.ne so tltat the street would not have to be Corn up in the future. Ilowever, the Ci.ty rejected this pr.oposal. The ~ngi.neer reporY_ed that to hi.s lcnowted~;e thi.s nevc:r camc up. The I;ngi.neer also stat:ed that whi.le a clry water.li.ne soun<ls f;ood, ~ahen t:hey are f:i.l.l.ed wi.th water there e~re numeroi.is problems that can occur with t:hem. If. problems do devel.op, the s[reeC has T.o be torn up any~aay to repa~ir the problems. Mrs. Nardini report¢d thaC in 7.980 water.main was turned down on County Koad I3-2 because of: Dianna Leme. And i.n 19f32 Di_anna L~ne a~;ain tur.neei clown watermai.n. Paoe -6-