04-27-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINIJ'i'ES Ci.ty Counci.l Apri.1 27, 1983 Oscar Lane Mr, Fahey suagested that the Counci.l consider a period of. time for Proposal Mr. Lane to relocate his business. Fahey also asked if there are other (ConC.) citi.es who all.ow this type of use as l.ong as it is not a pub].ic nuisance, The Planner stated that he l<new of none anct informed the Council that the C:ity of. Lakeville would not alioco thi.s use i.n an agricultural area. The tlttorney al.so staCed that he Icnew of. no cities that al.lowed thi.s in a residential. area. nr. Lane informed the Council that if: they gave him a period of ti.me to relocate, he would sti.l.l. have to i:al<e an FPA per.mit f.or the busi.ness. Mr. Flanson suggested that the Ci.ty gi.ve Mr. L,ane until the first oL the year Co relocaCe. The Attorney stated that he did noC thinl< the Ci.t:y could g~ive P4r. Lane an extended peri.od of time wi.thout having some problems develop because of. this. Mr.. Pahey stated that he f.el.t the CiT.y could gi.ve Mr. Lane a reasonable period oL ti.me to relocate. Mr. Sweeney stated that a ci.vil c.ourt acCion mip.,ht r.esult i.n Mr. Lane's getti.ng a 90 day relocation period. Mrs. Nard~ini stated that i.f: Mr. Lane's operation is so successful, Mr. I~ane can afford to ].ease a bui.lding. Nardi.ni poi.nted out t:hat T4r. Lane was contacCecl 1>y the I3ui.ldi.ng Inspector last Pall on this matte.r. Mr. Porsberg stated that he i.s wi.t.ling to give Mr. T~ane untzl the f.i.rst of the year, but felt there shouLd be no ext:ensions to thi.s ti.me period. Mr. Pahey introduced the Eoll.o~vi.ng resol.ution and moved i.ts adopti.on: RiiSOI,lITION N0. £23-4-175 - GRANTLNG OSCAR LANG UNTIL T1-IE P~IRST OT' TI~IE XEAR 'CO RPLOCATE HIS AUTO BODX BUSIi~L'SS IN AN OTiIIR I~OCATION 'L'he fore~;oing resolution o~as duly seconded by Mrs. Scalz,e, Ayes (4) Pahey, Scalze, Porsber.p„ ltanson. Nayes (1) Nard~ini. Resolution declared adopte<l. 19~i_s resol.ution appear.s in Resolution F3oolc No. 9, Page 192. Ntrs. Scalze commented that skie f.el.t when the Ple~nni.ng Commi.ssi.on voter.! on an i.ssue, T.hey shoul.cl be malcing a yes or a no r.ecommendat.i.on. P1rs. Nardi.ni. a~reed. 'Chomas Mr. Fahey statecl that it understood th2t swi.mmin~ pools were not Setback permitted uses in a front yard. The Planner re~lied that this was Vari.ance true of. the required front. yard of 30 feet. 'l'he Planner stated that 'Chomas' are also seelcing a f.ence vari.ance. Agenda Ttem No. £3 Page -13-