Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Counci.l <br />April 27, ].983 <br />Con<lo <br />conversi_ons <br />A~;en<(a <br />Item No. ].4 <br />The Ptanner suggested T.hat: the condi.ti.onal use permi.t couLd be. usecl as <br />another mechanism f.or eli.minati.np, the legal. question i.n the matter of <br />condo conversi.ons and parl< charges. <br />Mrs. Scalze aslced if t:he ACtorney shoul.d research thi, matter. <br />The Attorney stated that :in the Fluer Royale case the questi.on i.s <br />whether or not there i.s a subdivi.s:ion o~hen a condo conversion takes <br />place. <br />'Lhe Pl.anner f.e1C thaC the cond~i.ti.onal use permit would gi.ve the City <br />more sol.id bas:i.s for charging t:he parfc charge. <br />P1r.s. Scalze poi.nted out that the Ci.ty adopted a condo orclinance i.n <br />October of 1980. <br />Mr. Licht statecl that: as he understood the court case, f:irst Pluer <br />Royale di.d not f.eel Chat a subdi.visi.on was m~de, secondly, they <br />feel there is no diff:erence beCween condo and apartments because <br />the demanct is the same, and t;hird that the Ci.Cy has no basi.s or <br />i.nLormati_on t;hat would support t:hat a condo puts a higher usaz;e on <br />a park than an ap~rtment. <br />A1r. Li.cht suggested that he and the Ci.ty AtCOrney di.scuss the i.ssue <br />of the condi.tional. use permit. Mr. Hanson agreed, <br />Grass Cutt~i.ng Mr. Ji_m ~lorelan reported t:hat last year. the Recreat:i.on Department <br />spent: about 200 hours on grass cutting. The year bef.ore about 350 <br />Non-Agenda hour, were spe~nt. P4oreLan est.i.mated that :i.t woul<t tal<e between <br />Item No. 3 200 and 400 hours per year. for thi.s ~aork. Tl~tis incl.uded tri.m worlc <br />and the ~rass cutting at the Little Canada ;chool., <br />Mr. Morelan stated Chat he hacl no strong object~ions to tb.e Publ.ic <br />Worics Department takin~; over the ~rass cutti.ng function. Flowever, <br />he did not f:eel that fi.eld maintenance would be somethi.np, that would <br />worlc out for the Public Worlcs to talce over. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that the Council was not proposinn that fi.~ld <br />maintenance Ue taken over. <br />Mrs. Scalze reported tkiat the Recreation Department: had planned to <br />buy a new grass cutting tractor thi.s year. i9r. Porsberg sug~;ested <br />that should the f;rass ci.ttti.ng Ue turned over Lo Publi.c Wortcs~ the <br />Publ.ic Worlcs Department shouLd det~rmS.ne the type of machine that <br />shoul.d be purchased. <br />Mr. Fal~ey sug~;est:ed that P4r. ~1orelan worlc with Mr. Glanzer on thi.s <br />matter. <br />Porsberg si:ated that: he caas not i.nterested in the PuUl.i.c Worlcs Depactment <br />tal<i.ng over field mai.ntenance. <br />Page -22- <br />