Laserfiche WebLink
MTntrrrs <br />Ci.ty Council <br />Apri1 27, 19E33 <br />Grass Mr. i'orsberq; su~y,ested that: yr< P!Iorel.an worlc wi.t}t Mr. Glana.er regardi.n,~ <br />Cutti.ng the Public Florlcs taki.ng ovcr the grass cutting function. <br />(Cont.) <br />'Che City Clertc aslced ~i.f: the grass cuttin~; positi.on woulcl Ue <br />a<lverti.sed. Mr. Fahey st~ted that it wotalcl not as it woulct not <br />be a per.manent part-time posti.on. <br />I2ecreat-i.on Mrs. Dlardini. stated that she wanted to poi.nt out to the Counci.l. ChaY. <br />Part-Time aC the previous Cowicil. meeti.ng Che City Attorney would not say that <br />l:mployees the City was right in not payi.no overtime between 40 and 48 hours. <br /> P1rs. Nardi.ni. was concerned that t:he Ci.ty woulct Ue subject to a law <br />Non-A~;enda sui.t in th~is renard <lue to fu11-ti.me empl.oyees wo rtcing in a part-ti.me <br />Item No. 4 capaci.ty f.or the Recreati.on DeparC;nenC. <br />'l,oni.ng Mr. L:i.cht reported that ther.e have been numerous updates to the Ci.ty's <br />Ordinance zoning ordinance and sug gested that his ~taf£ put together 25 new <br />'Text Up-DaCe notebooks containing the updated zoning ordinance and then seC up <br /> a procedure to I<eep the boolcs current. The Planner stated Chat <br />9genda this would only cost the City in terms of mater.ial and cler i.ca7. worlc. <br />Item No. 15 Mr.. Licht reported that the clerical co st woulcl be $1.5 per. hour. <br />Mr. Pahey felt that the Ci.ty staff could do this work at a Lesser <br />cost to the Ci.ty. Fahey reported that he would d:iscuss Chi.s matter <br />~oith the City Clerlc. <br />Standards 7'he Planner submi.tted to t:he Council i.nf.ormati.on he put together <br />For Pri.vate rerardi.ng standards for pr:ivate streets. P1r. I{anson suggested that <br />Streets the Ci.ty ACtorney revi.ew this materi.al.. <br />Agenda <br />1Cem No. 1.6 <br />Land Use The 1?lanner reported that the land available in t:he City f.or developmenY. <br />Pi.scal was becoming less and less. At the same time the State Legislature is <br />Analysis throwing baclc more of: the burden on the Ci.ty i.n terms of property taxes. <br />Agenda The Planner stated that the use of the land should be a Lactor in the <br />Item No. 7] Counci.l's considerati.on oF. clevelopmenCS. <br />Mrs. Scalze asiced what impact it would have on the City with so much <br />of its ].an<i already developed. <br />The Planner stated that the land use fiscal. analysis would seC di.rection <br />in terms of the type o£ deveLopment [hat the City would want, Por <br />example, an apartment pays more taxes thzn a single family home. <br />Mr. Fahey su~;p,ested that the inf:ormeition is available if t:he Counci.l <br />woiil.d litce to take ac.lvantage of. it. <br />Page -24- <br />