05-25-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MTidUTFiS C:i.ty Counc~i.l. Meiy 25, 198~ 6chrier Mr. Pahey sCated thaC he £elt the Ci_ty sliort-sighted noe to address I?roposal. thi.s issue. (Cont.) ~4r. T,~orsberg asked the potential. for si.ri~;7.e fairni.7.y l~iomes on the Frattalone property, Mr. I,:i.cht replled tl~at Mr. T'ratt:al.one was tallci.ng about si.rigJ.e fami.ly homes and tw~ins at one point. 'Lhe Pl.anner sC~ted ti~~at it: wo~ald be hard to dctermine tkie access due to Che grades on ttie I~'r.at~alorie property. P4r. Li.c1,1t stated that the Ci.ty needs authori.z~t:ion to plan the Pr2Ctalone pron~~~rty. ~4r.. Pal~ey suggested th~~t a temporary ciil.-de-sac. could be puC. :i.n. T9r. Flanson poi.nCed out tha[ ~if th:is w~s establ.i.shed it woulcl be ~f'ra~ttalone's responsi.bil.:i.ty to hool< up to :i.t. Mr. Pahey comrnented Chat Mr. Schri.er should not be a1l~wed t:o de.vel.op his j~roperty and ianore his neighbors property. N[r. Schrier repor[ed that iAr. Preattalone only has al'~out 4~ acres oE properCy and [he potent::ial. for only about: 12 homesites. Mr.. ~aubney pointed ouC that Mr. Sclu-~icr is proposi.n~ l.ess 1e~~1 units than he i., ~1lowed. Mr. naubn~q ~oin~ed out: that the Cit~ i., talLei.ng e.ibout: 14-9 apartment ~mits v~rsus 96 apartment units. ~[r. 1'ahey asi:ed the r~ltio o£ 'I. to 2 bedroom a~ar.trnent uni.ts i.n the. 149 t:otal unit< ~-(r. Dai.~bney stated th~t i.t. woi.ild be a combi_naC~i.on but he di.c9 not have [he exact numb~r. Mr. I~orsberg ~oi.nted oat th~ fi.re pr.otecCi_on problems of a l~iroe apartmenL }~ui.ldi.n~; and stated Chat he pzef.'e,rr.ed th~: thiee smaller bui.l.di.ngs. Mrs. Scalzc aslced :i-f. t:he City could reqiiire smal.l.er aparCmenC bu~.i7.d:f.ngs. A4r. 0'Gonnor repl.i_ed tha.t. the City cou7.d requi.rc this i.,f. :i.t c~n demon- strate sorne I~,istory of a dangerous si.tuati.on wi_Ch lar;er btii7.di.n~s. P4r. Daubney aslced the Counci.]. ~ahat t:hey would l.itce - a comt~~i.naC:ion of apartmenCS, to~onhouses and sin~].e fami.7.y, or ap~lrCrnent:s and single famil.y. ~[r. Daubney sCated that. the Ci.ty must havc the gronncls to deny apar.tments. Falley stated tl~at he did not_ w~~mt T.o be st~ort--si.gltted and not prov~ide access to the Pratta].one proper.ty and also not hav~, access to the back o£ the apartment: bu:i.ldi.n~s for fire proCrct:ion. r4r. Daubney poinCed ouC tli1C t:he devel.op~r ,Pias pr.ovided for these poss~i.i~:i.1 i.ti.es. ;1r. Schrier po:irited out that in>uranc~.~ uncler.wri.i:,ers ~re the ones saho d~CcCate the type of build~.ng that c~ln be bui1C. 1?a;e -10--