Laserfiche WebLink
M.T,NUTIi> <br />City Councal <br />May 25, 1983 <br />Schiri.er Mr. Licht: r.eported that. h~ has checlced with the C~,i.ty t?ngi.neer and there <br />Proposal. ~ would 'nave Co he substantial gredi.ng on the 7?rattslone site to provid~ <br />(Cont:.) for access. <br />'L'he 1?Lanner st:ated t~aC thc ciil.-cle-sac ].ength i.s se~.i11 beyon<l the <br />1im~its, but Che nep,at:i.ve aspects o,f thi.s have been ra~duced because <br />of the ,tooped sCreet system For avner~ency vehicles. <br />'I'he Planner. reported thaC 1'~i.s conclus;i.on i.s that the stepped-clown <br />concept ~i.s positive 1nd shoul.d be, pursued. <br />Mr. P'attey aslced about_ T.he clens:i.t.y. 'Che Planner reportecl Ch~it )ie <br />fi~al.t the steppe<I-down concepC, w~s pos:i.tive as ~i.t di.stributes tl~c <br />d<-~nsiC}~ on the site and poi.ntecl out tl~iat the cleveloper coul.d proceecl <br />to cleve:l.op hi.s R-3 propert~ r.o it> ,fu11 density. <br />P~r. Pahey st:ated Chat the planncr prev~iously i_nd~ictited that 40 cCuad <br />un:i.ts woul.d not lx possi.ble. 'Che Planner rep7.~Led ehaC once the <br />parlcin~ spaces axe drazon out, 40 uni_ts may not be: possi.ble;. Hocaever, <br />the Councit i.s onlq cons-i.d~rinn concept at this poi.nC. <br />Mr. Fo~rsbern pointecl out that a r.eclucti.on ~i.n the number oP uni.ts wi17. <br />not be economi.cal7.y f.easi.bl.e. for the cievrloper. ~1r. Scliri_er stated <br />Chat t.hi_s was correct. <br />Mr. I'~h~y poi.nCed out tl~ac thc developE:r wotilcl probab].y bui.l.cl 250 uni.ts <br />iS he co~il.d geC approva7.. <br />Y4r. Datibney no~i_nted oirt: ttiat. currently i,mder C-i.t:y Code Che deveLoper <br />would be aLlowed 177 un~i_ts widrr presenC zonS.no. 149 of. tkiese toould <br />be a1~~arCmei~~t uni.t:s. <br />P'ahey 2isked why tl~ie C;i.ty eaot.i].d allaaa Piolding pond in th2 residenCi.a1 <br />area when t:l~te mosc cont:r~i_but-ion ~i.s .from the P,-3 area. P1r. Daubney <br />renl-i.ed Lhat ~s ].onn, as the dr2i.nage is provi.ded, the developer can <br />provide iC wl~~ere l~ie chooses. <br />I°[rs. Nardi.ni pointed out thaC the lo~i.cal C'lo~a o.E Craf.f~ic woul.d be <br />from Tona Lane. I'or,bc:rg po,inted out that 7ona I,ane ia currently <br />a non-conform~i.ng streeC. ~i;ocsherg pointed out ehat tlie Oity is doin~; <br />Che Iona Lane reside.nt, a favor by leavin~ i.C [:kiat w~1y. <br />~~1irs. Scalze aslce~l :i.f Che Counc~il. oras ready to condernn property to <br />put Iona Lane Chrou~;h. `4r. Daubney po~inCed ouC tti~t the C:ity could <br />assess t:he cost oE the cond~mnaC~ion a~ai.nst the benei'_iCed proPcst:y <br />and it aoul.d not cost the C~i.ty anyth:i.ng. <br />Mr. i'ahey aslced i.1' emer~ency access was providcd to CYte L'rattalone <br />proprrty. i4r. Daubney statecl that it w~~s not In ovided~ but tkierE <br />o~as noChing i.n 2:he way to pr.otiibiC i.t ei.t:her. <br />P~~;e -9- <br />