Laserfiche WebLink
~~I I P1iJ'f E S <br />Ci.tv Cottnc:il <br />Sept. 1~F, 1983 <br />Schtier Mrs. Scal.ze ,Eelt that the intent oP t:he Counci.l. was to rezone the <br />Reeon~i_ng nroperty norCh of County Road C and t:o ut~i1.:[zF thc. sCepped-down <br />(ConC.) zonl_ng ~oncept. Scalze st:ated that i_n her op:ini.on ?2-2 zonin~; For <br /> the property woul d be more i.n l<eFpin~ with whtit the Council and C~ity <br /> had in mi.nd w~i_th the steppeci--donm zoning concept. <br />Mr. Pahey sCated tltat he ~aas *,o:il.l.ing to support ~,uhatever the majori.i_y <br />of the Cotmcil woul.d do wi.Ch regard to downzoninp. Pahey fc1T the <br />Ci.ty owed :it; t_o t:he neighborhood t:o Irevent zin 8-unit apar.tment <br />buildiri~; Lrorn f;oing i.n, L'ahey stated that he woulcl ,upport ei.ther <br />R-1 zonin~ or R-2 de~end;i.ng where the votes are, <br />i4r. .7ohn Daubney, legal. representati.ve £or Mr. Schrier, ap~eared <br />before ttte counci.l. ~ir. Daubriey reported that ~ir. Schri.er has sold <br />the property on a contract-f.~or-cieed t:o h:lr. Lennon subject to i:lie <br />R-3 zoni.np,. If. the property ~is downzoned, Che property wi.ll come <br />back to t9,r. Scnrier. <br />Mr.. Dauuney also poinT.ed oi.it the topography of the si.te anc] felt that <br />tn:i.s nut limi.tations on the development: oF the property. <br />Daubne.y poi.nt:ed out t}iat Schrier bou<;}~t: the property as R-3 and <br />i.ntendecl to usr i.t for that purpose. Mr. Schrier has rel.ied on <br />Che ronin,v, of this pronerty. <br />Mr, Uaubney stated that the roost l.~i.kely use for the pr.operty would <br />be f:or 6 townhouses. T'he l:i.lcel.i.hood of: developi.ng the property t`or <br />sinal.e f:amily is not great. <br />19r. Daubney read T.o the Counc~i.l a 1.eCter Lrom *1r. Lennon Che purchaser <br />of: L-he property and also a realtor. P~tr. Lennon staCed that the <br />oroperCy is noC li.l<ely to Ue maricetable as sa.ngle or double f.ami.l.y. <br />If. tFie property i.s downzoned, the propert:y wi.11 gti baclc to Mr. <br />Schrier. <br />P1r< Daubney statecl Chat unless there is a compel.l.inn reason to do~•mzone <br />the property i.t should remain as i.s. 9'he City can cLownzone the <br />proper.ty us~in~; condemnati.on procedures and t}ien compensate `4r, <br />Schr:i.er f:or. [he ].oss oL value, <br />I)aubney stat:ed Chat the cost oL construct:i.on on this proper.ty would <br />be greaC due to the topogr.aphy, c1r. I)aubney requested on behal[ of <br />Mr< Schrier that Che zoninp, remain as i>. <br />@1r,> Nardi.ni. poi.nt:ed out that iS the property were downzoned Co I2-2 <br />i.C. i.s possi.ble to d.evelop six townhouses on the properCy. Nardini <br />fel.t that tkti.s ~.aould be tlie best i,ise o.f. the propert~. <br />Mr. Schrier stated tl~iat he purchased and sol.d t:he pro~etty on the <br />basis of its R-3 zoning. <br />Pa~;c -3- <br />