Laserfiche WebLink
A'(7:NU'L7'S <br />Gi.ty Coi.incil <br />Septo 7_8, 1.983 <br />:Lmp. 83--1.£3 P~Irs. Scal.ze oprned the publ~.i.c hearing on the improvement of <br />llesoCo from AL7.en F~venue to Count9 Road D. Mrs, 9c11zc i.niormed <br />Ap,enda Che aUdi_ei~ice that the Ci.ty has c~tlled this pab7.i.c I~e~.r.i.n~; a,ftcx• <br />:CCem No. 5 bei_n;; request:ed by ~7r< ~u,use f:or water, sewer and x~oad [o h~.i.s <br />property> r4rs> Scal.re stated ttiat tlie Gi.ty wantcd Co ~;e~ t.:l~c <br />property waners in to determi.ne how thcy fe~l. about the road <br />F,>e:i.np run a7.1 tltc; way throu~h. <br />'f7:ie 1'sngineex' repoz'Ced Chat the est~imated cost: of the ~rnprovement <br />-J_s .~'~,~19~ti,000. 'Chere ~re about 1,£~90 feet of. property to be <br />as,~~,sed. Property uncler the po*aer ].~i.nes wotil.d not be assessed9 <br />and Che property on the ,ouCh that has sewer, wnter exnd ro~d was noc <br />inc].uded. The est~irn~t:ed asses>ment: would be ~ti10?_ ~~>er front Eoot: on <br />. , e <br />each si.de of tile street, Sewer and water would be ass¢~~.ssed at 80/ <br />and CJ:ie ,CreeC would be assessed 100%. Tl~i.s saould Y,>ring the <br />assessmerit t:o the prooe~rty o~aners down to abou~_ $~£;,5 Co y90 per front <br />foot. <br />'Che F',ngi.neer pointed out: thlt th~i.s is a State aid road and i_f used <br />for >tate zi~i.d (unds, the C-i.ty coi.itd put -i_n r.i 9 ton road tand the <br />cost above thaC oF ~t i ton road woulcl be picked up by Stat:e ai.d funds, <br />The property owners would be assessed the normal res~i.dential ~issess- <br />ment. <br />,"[rs. Scalze poi.nt:ed out that t!~ic Cir_y has a petition a~;ai.nst the <br />improvement sit;ned by 100% of tl~e ~ro~erCy owners. <br />The Cl.ertc po:inted out Chat Mr. Iluse wou7.d l.i.tce t.:o devel.op or~e of <br />h:is l.ots. "~h-s. Scalzc commented Cl,iat Chi.s cannot be done. unl.ess <br />t:!ie lot: i, on an irnproved street. <br />Arnie Tssterbrool<s, representin~ Mr. F~uge, appear~d beEore Che Counci.l< <br />Mr< EsCerbrooks r.eported Chat P![r< Au;e may be closi_ng shortly on the <br />sal.e of his ~indust7ria7. pr,op~rt:y. Tf CYie p,rogerty ~i.s so1d~ Mr, Auge <br />woul.d be i.n ,`avor oL the i.mnrovements. Tf' not solct, t:hen ^:fr. Aug<:~ i., <br />af;ai.nst Che imgrovement. <br />Mr. L(ci.ne7. asl<ed if che Auge property were soLd if ~1r. Auge woutd <br />have to pay che assessmenC., ~Srs. Scal.ze commented LhaC thi-s would be <br />an agrcemenC between the sell.er and buyer of: 9~he prop<:rty, <br />'C?~e. C,';ty C1ec'k poi.cited out that t:here woul.d be no assessmerit ap.,ai.nst_ <br />t:.hc~~ ~ropcrt:y imtil tl e i.mprovement. :i.s orclered> <br />P:f,r. Pahey stated that: 11e ~oas noC in favor of thi_s publ~_c hearin~ <br />becau>e C:he :i.rnprovement was not peti.t:ionecl for by the property owners. <br />Mr. T'~hey reported that Ci.t:y po1~i_cy hzis been thaZ 50% or rnore of <br />the propert:~ own~ar.s musC be in favor of t:kis impr-ovement, t>e.fore [;h~ <br />C~i.ty wi.l.l. order :it. <br />D":r>. Scal~e poi_nCed out that: "~lr, Au~e also fronts on Centerville Road. <br />Page -5- <br />