09-28-93 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~I "f NIPCI~S Oi.t.y Counc-il gept. 2B, 1.983 Imp. Ato, 83-1.~3 (Cont.) i1r, Hyt~ind, r.epresenY:ing some otl~~er pro;~erty owner, :i_n the area, reported tilat they were not ap.,ai.nst tk~e improvemenC a~d could dec~ide e~i.ther *a~y because thei.r propc:rt.y i_s vp for sa,le. ^^,r. Esterbrootcs commented thxt water musc come f:rom Desoto to tlie Auge prope~rty and could not come from Cen~t~~~rvi11e< ^~Is, ~adeau asked ~iL t:here caould be no assessment for her propert~ tocated tu~ider the power 1~ine. The L,noi.neer repli.ed tkiat thai was correct. P4s. nt~deau aslced ho*a t~P improverncnt ben~aP~i.red her z~s her hous~ w~s 7.ocat:ed 1,300 f.eet from DeSoto9 und ehe house ~aas 1owe~^ than the 1~i.ne. The Prigi.ne~r agreed that xt mo~ilcL be impract-icnl. to connect the Tf~deau house. Ms, Nadeau asked if skie ~~rould he assessed a;ai.n on tl~ie front port:i.on oL her pr-operty. The ~E;ngineer corznnented Cl~iaY. i.t iozis a Lar~e Z~iece of property ~ind she would be 2ssessed apain< ~1rs. Scalze pointed out that tkie Property could b~a di.vided. One of the rnembers o.E the audi.ence ;;tated ChaY: Chey were agai.nst: ctzrb ~~nct gutter. Mr. Li.cht st:at:ed that t:he c~~r.b and ~;utter ~aas £or reg,ulati_np, drai.nane. 'Che f'.np;i.neer stat.ed that for Che last Y~.hrer-_ or four years tP~e CiCy has i.nstal.led curb and £;uCt:cr on al.l. new improvemenCS. A meinber oE tl~e auclience asl,ced i.i the >treet on the south e.nd o£ A11en was up to standard. 7'he Tngi.neer replS.ed that ~i.t ~.~as noC and it was a tempornry streeL, htr. Gair7_ey stal::ed that the street would have t.o be doiibl.e~. r4r. 71eS.r~e1 commentect thaC t~he property lii.s father has under the power line is di.,fficul.t to ee11. 9'he CiCy Cl.erLc reported thttt:. a portion o£ t:he Aei.nel pr.operey would not be assessed for the :i.mprovement d~,ie to the }~owerli.ne. 111C1U3~12y~1 - •n-/a-&'~ `lrs, Sc~lre poi.nted ouC t:hat tl~e area mi.xes res i.dent i.a1 ~ncl z;c>uwu .r.+.: . roeiinp,, ?9rs. Scalze d~i.d not thinlc the resi.dents would be ttapPy when i.ndustri.al devel.ops ~cross the st:reet. Scalze stlted that a couple of ye~ars ago lhe Council ].ootce.d at rezoni.ng this pro~erty to residentCal. i4rs, Scalze poi_nted ouC thaC t:kie property owners on the industrl.al. s:i.de coul.d Eorce the Council.'s hand i.n order~ing thcs iinprovement_ ap,atirist the ~ai_shes of the resi.dr:ntia7. s:i_de, industri.a7, o_ ~~a - ~~= 3 L~Ir. Fe.iney st:ated that if a 9 Con road were out in, ehe rcxmxe~~rr~-.- ~ propcrty stiould be ~ASSessed ~~~ore tha^ the resi.denti.al. 'Che ~ngi.nee~r po~inted out: that t:hi.s :i., what ~•ras done on Parlc ;r.reet:e Pnge -7-