11-22-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NIINU'LF? S Cit:y Council. Nov. ?.2~ ].9~3 I~rattalone "Che f:ore;o~Cn,p, resolut~i_on was duly secondecl by P1r_s. Scalze. Overloo].c Ayes (5) P'ahey, Scalze, Hanson, T'orsbF~rn,, Aardtini. Add. (Cont.) ~?ayes (0). Resol.ut.i.on dec7.ared adopted, This resolut:ion ~p~peax~s z.n Resolut:~ion Floolc No. 9, Pflge 615 Mr. PraCta7.one requestFd that he be ~i.ven final plat approval. for the. Rounei Lal.ce Over'l.ook Add~_eion. Mr. ?tanson aslced :i.f the se~aer quest:i.on aoul~~ prohibit tlie Counc~il. f~rom approvi.ng t}~~e clevelopment. The l?n~ineer repLied that; :it ~aoul.d not. Mrs. Scalze poi.nt_ed out th~C the Pl.anner has recommended tltat LoC 12 be buffered fr.om County 7Zoad. C, *4r< Prattalone poi_nCed oi.it that: the 7.ot i.s S f,eet: above the road ancl tl~ere a7re t~rees and bushes on Che ].ot. The Planner stated that preterabl.y the scr,cening Si~~ould be LS f.~eot hip,h. Mrs, Sctilze cornmented that the City l~ias noC required people to buf.fer the~ir own 1ot.s. Usual.l.y buC£er~i.ng is rc.quired to protect: a proper~y owner. 'Che~ Planner sCaled that t?~i.s was not. a major probl.em to h:i.m The 7?l.annc.er poi.nted out that under subdi.vi.,ions and PIJD's 1C ~i.s auY_omaC~ic policy to requir.e deve7.opment a,reementse 'Che PLanner asked about the si.tuation when t1~e deveLoper i.nstal.l.s uC~il.i.ties. P~(rs. T7ardini asl<ed ~i.f a perf:ormance bond should 1'~e required. The Planner. sCated that. thi.s is usuall.y requ:i.red as part of tne development contract. Mr. }1'anson asked i_f, there was a need for khis. D~tr. Frattalone asl.ced ho~a the Ci.ty coul.d r~quire a perfor.naance bond ~ahen the o~aner and developer were the same. 'I'he Attor~ney poini:ed out tY~aC the nlatting code states thaC m Developer's AgreernenC sliou7.d be subnu.ttecl. The Attornsy pointed out that; once a pl.at is approved, the Cit.y has ~in i.nterest to see Chat util.it4.es and improvernents are consCructed ca:i.thin t1~e p1aC. The ~tCOrney po:inted ouC t.hat i.n t.he Johnson p7.<~n, there may be no public i.mproverne~nts, just some ded~icat~i.on of ease~rients. However, i.n the ['rattatone s~i.tuation the Code requires the Devel.oper's ~,recment, ~Nr. l~ianson asked if the City has requi.red Chis i.n tY~e past. 'Phe Attorney repl;ied thaL as f:tar. as he lcnows it has been required. ~Pztge --10-