My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-83 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
11-22-83 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:35:48 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N(IPdiPt'P.S <br />C~.i.ty Coi.incil <br />\ov. 22, 1983 <br />Frzittalone <br />Overlook Add. <br />A{;enda <br />ICem DTo. 7 <br />Mrs. SCa1ze i.ntroduced the f'.o1.locai.ng resolution and moved ~its adopY.i.on: <br />RPSE)LU'i'ION N0. £33-71-'i63 - I3P.S.NGTNG TO <br />TABLL; 'I'1Di i~'RA7'9`AI.~ONl3 OVPRLOOIC ADD7.TTOD1 <br />'Che f_~oregoing reso7.uti_on :aas dul.y se.conded by Mrs. P]ardini.. <br />Ayes (5) Scal.ce, NarcLi.ni, hanson, Pahey, Porsberg. <br />Nayes (0)• <br />KesoluC:ion declared adopted. <br />This resolut:ion appe~ars in Resol.ut:ion ~lodc No. 9, Page 614~. <br />'L'he Ci.ty Enf.>,ineer xeported t:hat Mr. 'Prattalone has 1.5 lots and across <br />the street f,rom the ~P'r~ttalone property Chere ~is the pot:ential ~For <br />about 7J 1ots. TI~¢refore, cL1e 1?i~i.~.~~i.neer fe1C that the adjacent propc.rty <br />should Z~arti_cipate i.n the cost:. of t:he sewer 1ift: st~t::i.on rhaC "!r. <br />Fractzil.one has to construct to tlte exCent that the s~i.z.e has to 1?e <br />i.ncreased to service these adjacent propert~ies. <br />'J'he Pn~i.neer reportecl that the est~J.mated cost; of t:he LLLC stltion is <br />~].5,000. The 1?ngineer Eett that the addi.t~ionsl cost due Co t.he. <br />adjacent properties aas ~around $2,000 to ~3,000 but: stated that; 1:ie <br />would have to deterrnine Chi.s. <br />T1r. Pahey .f.e].t tliat the Schr~ier tri.anf;le shoulcl have to p:i.cl< up <br />part of: this cost an<1 f:'e1C that t:his condition shoul.cl be pl.aced <br />i.n the PUll Ap,reement. ',Ch<; ACtorney f:el.t i.t should be in wri.ti.ng. <br />T.he L'ngirieer did not think thaC tl'~e tri.angle could be. servi.ced by <br />s~~~caer f:rom OLd Coimty Road C. <br />The Attorney st:ated that: the C;i.ty w~i11 need a uiaiver of the ri-~,ht <br />to appeal. such an asse>sment. <br />Nir. Porsberg poinCed out t:hat :i.,f: t:here ~i_s t}.ze possibil~i.P:y of.~ I~oo(cing <br />up to >e.~~rer frorn Ol.d Cotimty Road C, the Citq ~ould noY, requir.e tt~iem <br />to conncct to t1~e other li_ne> <br />Pahey ~oinked out that f~.he r~~~qt.iirement i.n tl~e PUD w~l.l]. leave t:he <br />City oritli t:he flexibi1.i~y of chargin~ the tr.i.angl.e. <br />i~irs. Scal.ze fclt that someone should conCact `t4r. Lein and i.raf.orm him <br />i.t may noC bc poss:i.ble t:o com~ect: Co secver Irom Old County Road C. <br />The Engineer stated t_hat he cvoul.d do th9.~< <br />~~tr< PaPiey i_ntroduced the fol.lowin~; resolution and moved ~i_ts e~dopt:i.on: <br />Rf?S~LU'CSON N0. 83-11-564 - INC013YORA7'ING AS P~~:t'T' <br />OI~ THI3 CONDI'CSONLIL tiSIi PI'sP..MfT POR 'C1'(E SCHRIER <br />TYIANGULAR PI20PL;IZTY 'I'Hr1T 'CHIS YROPERTY PART:[CIPAT~E <br />T\ ,4NY COS'CS AS F~RP. NECBiSnRY 7:N TkIF J20UND LAt<E <br />OV^1:L,00K ADDIT7,ON SANI'CARX SI',G7Pi2 LS1~~"t' STA'!'I0~ <br />pa~e -9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.