Laserfiche WebLink
A1TNU'CP~i <br />Ci.ty Counc~i_7. <br />Nov. 22, 19£33 <br />Johnson 7'he fore~o~i_ng r.esol_ut:i.on was du7.y second~d by ~:4r. Forsbei°g. <br />PUD (~ont.) Ayes (5) T'~hey, l~orsberg, 19anson, Scal~e, ~Iard~Lri~i< <br />Naryes (0)• <br />Resoluti.on declared adopt:ed. <br />'Chis r.esoluCi.on z~pUears ~,i.n Resoluti.on "3oolc Aio. 9, ~}'a~es 51.1. and 61?_e <br />'Cest Amendment <br />Por Screen- 9'he P',lanner reported that t.kae Planni.n~ Commi.ssi.on d~i.d not revi.ew <br />pririCinp; the Proposed text amendment T~~ermi.tti.np screenpri_nti_ng o.f, ~;armeCSl <br />apparel i.n the J3-3 zoni.ng di>tri.ct. There£ore, the Planner <br />Agenda recormnended tl~i~t council postpone lction on Lh~i_s unt:il tneir <br />Item No. 5 December meet:in~. <br />Anderson Mr. Ri.cl~ard ~nderson appeared be:Eore Che Cotmcil requestinv conceuC <br />Property apnroval of: hi.s proposed si n~;le fami_]. y development i.n S4~,apl.e~•rood. <br /> T4r< Anderson coould l~ilce to connect to Li.P~.CI.e Canada secaer and wrrt er <br />A~enda Eor his development. <br />[Cem No. 6 <br /> i~[r.e< t~ardi.ni_ su~f;ested Chat t:he C~Lty sC~~.f.f ineet wi.th Aiaip7.ecaood on <br /> th:i_s matt:er k~efiote Counc~i_1 malces any decisi.ons. <br />Etr. Fa}iey asjced where the lndezson road ~voiald er,terid Co. N[r. And¢~rson <br />repl~i.ed t:hat: t:he property beyond Ct~e road is o~aned by a Lietl.~ <br />Canada resi.dent. <br />14r. Anderson expl.ai.ned the hi.story o.f various propos~als he ki2d made <br />for t1~i., propert:y i_n t.he past, ,1nderson ztlso expl.a:i.ned Che drai.nage <br />tior the prot~erty. <br />Mx. Ande~rson cominerited that !4apl.ewood 11ae indicated that under ti~e <br />pres~nt proposal he would not be utilizi.nf; the properCy to iks fu7.1 <br />potenti.a L Howe.ver, And~~;rson fel.t that his proposal was al1 t}iat <br />was reasonable. <br />"9r< Anderson explai_ned t}~at before Maplewood would consi.dcr ni.s <br />devctopment, hc had to get zipproval for watex• froin I,~i.ttle Canada. <br />Anderson explained t:.ha[ thi.s was the fi.rst step< <br />t4r. ~Pahey asked i.f. Ch~i_> w~is Che same propert}- t:hat. he ~>reviously <br />proposeel for towntiouses, T4r. Anderson ,tated th~t i_t was in adcti.ti.on <br />to the Manis property. Mr. Andcrson expl.~:i.ned Cl~iac. the Mani.s property <br />may also caant sewer and waCer at some poi.nt and that Che pro~~erCy was <br />zoned for R-1. <br />t1rs. Nardini stated that if. the Council. ~pproves the concept ton:i.ght, <br />she would li.lce to tal<e further act~i.on on the nroposat. as it <br />becomes nece-sseiry. <br />Ilage -7- <br />