Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-14-84 Council MinutesMZNUTPS TO T1~F REGUL,AR MPTTING CITY COUNCIL LITTLT CANADA, MINNESOTA Agenda Item No. 1 Agenda Item No. 7_ Approval Of 'Che Minutes Agenda Item No. 3 Blaine Racing I'aci.lity Pursuant to due call and noCice thereof a regular meeti.ng of Lhe Council of the City of LiYt1e Canada, Mi.nnesota oras held on the 14th day ot March, 1984 i.n the Counci.l Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Li.ttle Canada Road in said City. March 14, 1984 Mayor Raymond Hanson chai.red the meeti.ng and called i.t to order at 7:32 P.M. and the foilowi.ng were present at roll. call: MPMBERS PRFSENT: Mayor Counci.lman CounciLman Counci.lwoman Councilwoman Mr. Raymond I~Ianson Mr. E4ichael Pahey Mr. Dennis i'orsberg Mrs. Mugs Nardi.ni PSrs. Ileverly Scalze ALSO PRESIiNT: City Clerlc City Engineer Ci.ty Attorney Recording Secretary Mr, Joseph Chlebeclc Mr. Donald Carley Mr. Thomas Sweeney Mrs. Kathleen Glanzer Mrs. Nardini i.ntroduced the f.ollowi.ng resoluti.on and moved its adoptzon: I2FSOLiJTION N0. 84-3-95 - APPROVING T.HE MINUTES OF THF PEBRIJARY 22, 19£34 COiJNCII. MEF.,TING The toregoing resoluti.on ~aas duly seconded by Mr. Pahey. Ayes (5) Nardini., Fahey~ Hanson, Forsbery„ Scal.ze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution }~oolc No. 11, Pa~e 103. Mayor Francis Fog,erty of the City of Blaine appeared before the Council. Playor ]?ogerty was ,eelcing the support of Little Canada for the location of a horse racin~ facili.ty in the City of Blaine. Agenda Mr. Pogerty informed the Council that I3laine has a lot of suitable Item No. 4 land for this faciLi.ty and informed the Council that the City has designated 689 acr.es for the site. Also a devetoper has been secured tor the race tr.aclc. The proposed name of the track is Mi_nnesota Meadows. Mr. Po~erty pointed out that 35W runs through the City and is only at 57_% ot its capacity. Therefore, there ~aould be no problem with access to the track. There i.s also sewer anct water to the si.te. The City of Illaine had to rezone some of the property and the property around the site is zoned commercial and industrial. Page -1- hINUTrS City Council March 14, 1984 ~l.ai.ne Mayor Pogerty pointed out that withi.n 30 mi.nutes 1~300,000 people Racing can get to the site. Paci.lity (Cont.) Pogerty expl.ai.ned that the track packa~e i.s a$56,000,000 one and the City has set up a tax i.ncrement distri.cC and wi.l.l. put in $19,500,000 over an 18 year peri.od. Piper Jaff.ery &}topcoood have set up the fi.nancing packa~e. There are some limited partners, and tliey are all Minnesota people and money except for Che architect on the project. Mrs. Scalze asked why Mayor Fogerty was seelcing Little Canada's approval. Mr. Fogerty feLt that this would help I3laine's case an<! reported that they have resoluti.ons from ci.ti.es ~oith 417,000 geople. Mrs. Scalze stated that she did not knoca that she was qualified to determine which ci.Cy would be the best Location for the racing facili.ty. Mr. Fogerty pointed out that 131aine is ].ocatel on the north side and the whole area would have a 1ot to gain. L'ogerty pointect out that there are no major recreational faci.lities on the north si.de. Mrs. Scalze stated that she di.d not kno~a the faci].i.ty would benefit the north side that much and commented that she lilces the north side as i.t is and did not want to Li.ve in I3loomington, Mr. Paltey asked why ?3laine versus Woodbury. Mr, i'ogerty stressed the l.ocation of. Blai.ne in the north side, Mr.. }lanson i.ntroduced the following resolution and move<t its adopti.on: RESOLUT,I.ON N0. 84-3-96 - SUPPORTING TH1: LOCA'LION OF A R9CING PACILITY TN THE CITY OP I3I,AINP The foregoi.ng resolution was duly secon<ted by Mr. Porsberg. Ayes (3) Hanson, Porsberg, Pahey. Nayes (0), Mrs. Scalze and ~trs. Nardini abstained. This reso7.ution appears in Resolution Boolc No. ll, Pages 104 and 105. Vacation Mayor Hanson opened the public heari.ng on the proposed vacation of. Of Lake Str. Lalce Street f.rom Ri.ce Street to Park Street. Hanson pointed out Prom Ri.ce To that the vacation was bei.ng considered by Council in~itiati.on. Parlc Mrs. Scalze stated that she assumed the City would consi.der onl.y Agenda the portion that was aslced for. P1r. Pahey pointed out that the Item No. 5 Engineer stated that Lake Street in this area was not f.easi.ble due to the cost, and once one end of the street was sealed ofL, it made Pa~e -2- MINiITPS City Counci.l March 14, t984 Vacation Of. no sense to leave the other end open. La(ce Street (Cont.) Mrs. Scalze pointed out that Mrs. Malaslce has not requested the vacation. The City Clerlc reported that he spoke with Mrs. Malasl<e's attorney and i.nformed him that should the street be vacated, Mrs. Malaske wi11 receive half of it. T.he Cl.erk stated that the Attorney did not i.ndicate whether Mrs. Malaske was opposed to the vacation or not. Mr. Flanson aslced the status of the title of Che propertye The Clerk repli.ed that the Attorney i.ndicated that this is being resolved. hlr. Donald Behr asked why the Ci.ty was going to vacate the street at this time. Mrs. Nardini. replied that the City was followi.ng through with previous discussi.on with Mr. T3ehr on this matter. Mr. E3ehr stated that he was not ~ainin~ anything by the vacation. i~ehr requested that i£ the street is vacated that he be granted a f.ill permit, a deed for the property, and that the property be surveyed. Behr pointed out that he i.s bei.ng assessed for property that he does not own. Mr. I3ehr stated that he would not vacate the street as it is a commerci.al area and could be an outlet for Parlc Street. Mr. Pahey pointed out that the cost of putting Lake Street ~~n is too hi.gh. f3ehr stated that the property is low and there is a catch basi.n on it. Mr. rahey staCed that the reason the City i.s vacati.ng the property is to get the assessment covered. Fahey stated that the property would be of some benefit to Mr. I3ehr as he would own it. Mr. Hanson asked how many yards of fi.l1 would be necessary. Mr. I3ehr stated Chat he did not Icnow. Mr. i'ahey stated that he did not feel the City should retain a road easement for a street the k;ngzneer says is not feasi.ble to put in. Nardini poi.nted out that the City simply has a road easement over the pro~erty. Mr.. Hanson aslced i.E Mr. l~ehr. cou7.d appeal the assessment. The Attorney replied that the appeal time has run. The Engineer stated that he will replace the property lines in the area. Page -3- MzNU•rrs Ciry Council March 14, 1984 Vacati.on Of Lake Street (Cont.) Mr. F3ehr asked if. the City vacated the street if he had to accept it. Mrs. Nardini stated that the Ci.ty only has a road easement over the property and Mr. Sehr already owns the property. Mrs. Scalze aslced if. Mr. Behr's taxes would appreciabl.y chanp,e with the addition of this property. The Engi.neer d:id not feel that Mr. i3ehr's taxes woul.d change. Mrs. Nardini introduced the fol.lowin~ resolution and moved its adopti.on: RESOLUTION N0. 8~r3-97 - CLOSING TIIE YUI3LIC HFARING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OT' LAKE uTREET FROM RICE STREET TO PARK STREET The foregoing resoluti.on ~vas duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Ayes (5) Nardini., Scalze~ Hanson, Pahey, Forsberg. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resoluti.on appears i.n Resolution Eloolc No. 11., page 106, The Engineer suggested that it the Ci.ty vacates Lalce Street, that it retain a?_0 foot drai.nage easement over this property unti.l he determines which way drainage will flow. Mr.s. Nardini i.ntroduced t:he f.ollowi.n~; resolution ancl moved its adopti.on: RESOLU'TION N0. 84-3-98 - APPROVTNG TH~ VACATSON OF LAKE STRErT FROM PARK ST32F~T TO RICP STR~ET WIT11 THE RETENTION OF A 20 POOT DRAINAGP EASEMFNT IN THF. CENTPR Collova House Relocati.on Agenda Item No. 6 The foregoi.ng reso].ution was duly seconded by Mr. Porsberg, Ayes (4) Nardini, PorsUerg, I'ahey, I{anson. Nayes (1) Scalze. Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Boolc No. 11, Page 107. Mrs. Scalze i.ntroduced the foilowing resol.ur.i.on and moved i.ts adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 84-3-99 - i~RINGING 'P}!E PIATTER OP THE COLLOVA HOUSF. RELOCATION TO TAISLE The fore~;oing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. Ayes (5) Scalze, Porsberg, Fahey, t{anson, Nardini. Nayes (0). ResoLuti.on declared adopted. Thi.s resolution appears in Resolution Aoolc No. ll, Page 108< Page -4- MINUTES City Counci.l March 14, 1.9~4 Collova House Relocati.on (Cont.) Mr. Hanson pointed out that the public hearing on the Col.lova house relocation has been cLosed at the previous Council meeting. Mrs. Nardini asked if Mr. Collova has determined the location oE the house on the lot. Mr. Collova stated that the location may be as set out on the plan that the city has. Mr. Collova stated that he spoke with 4 or 5 of. the neighbors that were nor, at the last Council meeCi.ng, and they are not opposed T.o Che relocation of the house on the Demont lot. Collova also reportect that he spoke wi.th Roger Glanzer who informed him that the drainage whi.ch causes the puddle in front of Dan Campanaro's house comes fr.om the side o[ the street where the Campanaro's house is and not the side that he i.s talkin~; about. Therefore, the puddle will still be there whether Chis house is moved or noC. Mr. For.sberg stated that the nei~hbors were concerned that the house will add to an existing drai.nage problem. Mr. Fahey asked iE Che gar.age could be relocated. Mr. Collova replied [hat he could put the garage anywhere where set backs ~ai11 be met. Mr. ilanson asked if soil borings have been done yet. Mr. Col.lova repli.ed that they have no[ as he wanted approval for the iiouse relocation first before he spent any money on the property. 'Che Attorney reportect thal i.f. the borings are not satisfactory to Mr. Collova, he will have the option r.o void the contract. Mr. Hanson commented tihat if the soil bori.ngs are bad, the lot may be unbuildable. Mr. I'orsberg pointed out that t:here are a lot of. ways to put in a foundat~ion. Mrs. Scalze stated that she has loolced at the area and determined that there ar.e si.x homes within 600 feet that have the same style as the home proposed to be moved in. Scalze stated that the house is comparable to a Lot of the homes in the area. Mr. Pahey asked if it were possi.ble T.o move the house forward on the lot so as not to adverseLy i.mpact on the 0'Banion home. Mr. Collova stated that he would need a variance to place the home even with the 0'P,anion home. Mr. 0'I3anion stated that he received a fi.ve Eoot variance. Mrs. Nardini. stated that there are other homes in the area that are set back. Mr.. Collova stated that he thinlcs the soil is better in the bacl.c. Mr. 0']3anion i.ndi-cated that Lurther bacl< on the 1ot is the 1ow area ancl would require more fi11. Page -5- MINUTFS City Council March 14, 1984 Collova Mr. Collova stated that he ~oould lilce the house closer to the road, House but he thinlcs that is where most of: the fill is. Collova stated that ReLocati.on he wi11 not Icnow the condition of the soil until the borings are done. (Cont.) Collova stated that it shoul.d be his option ~oher.e the house i.s located. Mr. Pahey pointed out that if the City sold the lot to someone else who built a house, the City could not dictaCe the pl.acement of the house. Mr. Hanson stated that the Gity cannot control aestheti.cs with new construction. }lowever~ C.ity Code must be met. Mr. Hanson stated that under the conditi.onal use process~ the City does have more control. Hanson felt that the proper contr.ols were in place, and poi.nted out that if the soil conditions are not suitable, Mr. Coll.ova will have the opti.on of voidi.ng the contract. Mr. 0'I3anion aslced if drainage would be consi.dered. Mr. Hanson replied that this is spelled out in the Planner's report dated February 2, 19t34 and Mr. Collova wi11 have to meet these requirements. Mr. Ilanson tintroduced the following resoLution and moved its adoption: RIiSOLUTION N0. 84-3-100 - GRANTING THG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RI;QUGSTFD 13Y RICt1ARD COLLOVA POR RPLOCATION OF A HOUSE TO 317 DEMONT AVFNUE SlJF3J~CT TO TIIF RIiQtIIRrMFNTS OUTLINTI) IN THE PT.ANNER' S R~PORT OP PEf3RUARY 2, 1984 AND SUI3JECT TO APPROVAL OP TFIP F3UILllING INSP~CTOR 'Phe foregoing resoluti.on was <tul.y seconded by Mr< Pahey. Ayes (5) Hanson, Scalze, Pahey, Porsber~;, Nardini. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resoLution appears in Resolution I~ook No. 1.1, Page 109. Mrs. Nardi.ni aslced hocv the Ci.ty wi.ll handle the si.tuation if the location of. the house changes substantially. Mrs. Scalze commented that the CiCy has no control of. thi.s as long as setbacks are met. 'Che Ci.ty Clerlc reported that the cLosi.ng date on the purchase agreement was March 10 and Mr. Collova has requested that this date be chan~ed to Apri.l 10. Tlte City Attorney stated that he can prepare a supplement to change this ciate. Mrs. Nardini introduced the following resoluti.on and moved its adopti.on: RPSOLUTION N0. F34-3-101 - AUTIIORIZING THE yAYOR AND CITY CL~RK TO EXECUTE A REVIS~D PURCHASE AGREGMENT SdITII MR. RICI[ARD COLLOVA POR THIi DLMONT PROPIiRTX Page -6- MzNUTrs City Counci.l March 1.4~ 1984 Collova The fore~;oing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Forsberg. House Ayes (5) Nardini., Torsberg, Hanson, Scalze, Pahey. Relocation Nayes (0). (Cont.) Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resol.uti.on I~oolc No. 11, Page 110. 3.2 I3eer & Mr. Ross Thortenson, Attorney, re~resenting the princi.ples i.nvolved Wine License in the Great Shanghai Restaurant, appeared before the Council. Great The Great Shanghai. Restaurant. is requesting approval. of an on-sal.e Shan~;hai 3.2 beer and wine li.cense. Restaurant T4r. Thortenson expllined the quali.fications of his cl.ients in the Agenda restaur.ant busi.ness. ' Item No. 7 Mrs. Scalze introduced the followin~ resol.ution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 84-3-102 - APPROVING AN ON-SALE 3.2 IIrER AND WINE LICENSI3 POR 'LI~IE GRT'AT SI~IANGkIAI RFSTAitRANT 'PO I3E LOCATPD IN TIIE MAKKTT PLACT The foreg,oing resoluY.ion was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. Ayes (.5) Scalze, Nardini, klanson, PorsUerp„ Pahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. Thi.s Resoluiton appears in Reso7.ution I3ook No. 17., Page 111. LeMay Pinal The City Engineer reported that he has reviewed the LeMay final plat Plat and it is satisfactory. Agenda Mr. LeMay statecl that the Addition will now be called Charles Addition Item No. 8 as there is another LeMay Addition in Ramsey County. Also there is a problem wi.th the street names and asked for suggestions for the southern leg of street i.n the addition. Council felt that as the one street is named Slindward Sday the souther.n leg should be Leewar.d iday. Mr. LeMay poi.nted out rhat a 60 foot cul-de-sac on the souLhern leg of st'reet w:ill cut into the existing house. LeMay requested that a 50 foot cul-de-sac be approved. The City Clerk reported that the City does have a couple of. 50 foot cul-de-sacs. I~]rs. Scalze pointed out that the cul-de-sac i.s a temporary one. Mr. Porsber.g sY.atecl Chat this was agreeable to him. Pa~e -7- r~zNUTrs City Council March 14, 1984 LeYnay Pinal Mr. rahey asked if. Mr. LeMay submitted proof oL ownership of the PLat (Cont.) property. LeMay repLi.ed that he has. Mr. P'ahey asked if. LeMay was aware that the City had a mor.atorium on duplexes and may change its current 1 in 10 provisi.on. LeMay said he was aware of this and pointed out t)iat the Planning Commission i.ndicated that they might be a~reeable to the 1. in 10 provision in new areas where a larger lot has been provicied for a duplex. It ~oas pointed out that the other cul-de-sac on the plat had only a 50 foot radiuse The Engi.neer re~lied that this is because it is not really a cul-de-sac, but a bubble. Mrs. Nardini pointed out that approval of Che prel.i.minary nlat handled the park charges which were set at ~300 ~er lot i.nctuding the ex:isting homes. The Clerk aslced Mr. LeMay if he caere aware of the County's recommendations. Mr. I.eMay sta[ed that he was. Mrs. Nardini introduced the following resolution and moved i.ts adoption: RGSOLiITION N0. 84-3-103 - APPROVING T1[E FINAL PLAT POR LEROY Li?MAY AND ALLOSdING A 50 FOOT CUL-DE-SAC The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by hlr. Pahey. Ayes (5) tianson, Nardi.ni., Fahey~ ForsUerg, Scal.ze. Nayes (0). Resolution decl.ared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Boolc No. 17., Page 112. Prank The Pngi.neer reported that Mr. Prank Frattalone must build a lift Prattalone station to service his property on Cotmty Road C witlt sewer.. Mr. Li.Lt Frattalone wants to be reimbursed Lor part of. the cost as the sewer Station li.ne ~oi.ll also service property on County Road C that does noC belong to him. The Lngzneer reported that. he has not heard from Agenda ~1r. Lein whether or not hi_s development wi.11 be using this sewer Item No. 9 line• The Ppgineer reported that the Risty pr.operty will be coming in wi.tll a devel.opment, and part of this property w~i11 need sewer from County Road C. Mr. Pr.attal.one estimated the cost of the li£t. station at $8,700 wi.th no labor.. krattalone inEormed the Council that he paid $4,000 in sewer assessments on this property that dLd him no good as Che sewer was a dead l.i.ne. PaF>e -8- MINUTES Ci.ty Council March 14, 19F34 Prattalone Li£t Station (Cont.) 7'he En~;ineer Lelt that the area shoul.d be explor.ed Lor the potential number of hooic-ups to thi.s sewer li.ne. 'Lhe C'ity Clerlc f:elt Chat ~ connection charge coul.d be added to bui.ldi.ng permits as people connect to Chi.s sewer. Mr. Prattalone stated that he was not opposed to having co wait for any reimUurse- ment. Frattalone stated that he would have been satisfied with not havi.n~ to pay the assessment. The Clerlc reported that the assessments in the area were deferred~ and once the li.ft station is installed, the assessments wi11 go bac(c on. Mr. I'orsberK aslced who wi.ll maintai.n the lif.t stati.on. Mr. Prattalone replied that he plans to turn the street and lift stati.on over to the City. T'rattalone pointed out that he pai.d an assessment for a sewer that was no gooct to him. Prattalone stated tha[ i.f he did not hoolc up to thi.s sewer, the oCher properties i.n the area could not devel.op. Pahey suggested that the City come up with a f:i.gure now, rather than making Mr. Frattalone wait f.or any compensation. Mr.s. Scalze felt that any costs reimbursed T.o Prattal.one, the Ci.ty should try to recoup. Scalze asked it the City cou7.d pl.ace an extra connection charge on the building permit. The City Attorney replied that the Ci.ty could do this. It was suggested that the Ci.t:y insta).1 the lift stat~ion. Mrs. Scalze poi.nted out that the City cvould have to have an assessment hearing for these costs. Pahey felt i.t woul.d be cleaner to let Mr. Frattal.one put in the Li.£t sT.ation. Pahey also pointed out Chat the property owners did have the right to appeal the assessment and they di.d not. L'ahey state,d ChaC he was not sympathic to completely elimi.nati.ng the assessment. Ranson commented that perhaps the City should pay the cost of the lif:t stalion. Nardini questionecl why the City would want to do this, when Mr. Prattalone i.s only aski.ng for the cost of the assessment he pai.d. S4r. Frattalone asked :if when the City charges a secoer assessment, if i~ is the Cit.y's responsibility to provide sewer. The Attorney repl.ied that this was not the case and reported that the City has assessed property for se~aer that dict not get to the property. Mr.. Fahey aslced Mr. Frattalone if he would be happy with rei.mbursement of the assessment. Prattalone replied that he would 'ue. Mrs. Scalze questi.oned what the City would tel7. people if. it reimbursed the Prattalone assessment and not their's. Pap,e -9- MINUTF.S City Council March 14, 19£14 Prattalone The Attorney reported that the City could parti.cipate in the cost Lif,t of. the 1i.ft stati.on to Che extent of the Prattalone assessment< Station Then at such time as the property to the south connects to seever, (Cont.) the City could charge a connecti.on char~;e [hat wot.ild be an appropri.ate divis:i.on of the r~ssessment. Scalze felt that the City should not forgive the assessment unless it is prepared to forgive other assessments. Scalze Le1t that the City should participate in the cost oL the li.ft station. Mr. Porsberg di.d not ].ilce the idea of addi.ng another connection charge to the other properties. 'The rn~;ineer reported that if the City takes over the project, the City wi.ll. have to take bids on iC. The Cl.erk reported that whenever. the City assesses a cost, bids must be talcen. The Engineer. reported that the City had a route through the area for the sewer that di.d noT, necessitate a lift station, however, this route would cause Mr. PraCtalone to lose many of, hi.s lots. Pahey pointed out that i.n this case Mr. Prattalone would have had to put in a].ift station re~ardless, due to the way he is developing his property. Porsberg stated that if the li.ne on County Road C were live, a l.ift stati.on would not have been necessary. The T:ngineer a~;reed, Uut pointeci out Chat FratCalone woul,d lose about 10 loCS. The Engineer stated Prattalone is usi.ng a].ot of 1ow lan<1 that the City had discounted. P'ahey commented that the part o£ the cost of the Li.ft station that benefits the other pr.ope.rty in the area should Ue abated. Fahey f:elt that then an assessment hearing should be held for the other properties. Scalze questioned how this could be done without putting the liLt stati.on out for bi.ds. The Bngineer suggested that the cost be picked up in connecti.on charges. The Clerk commented that the City will have to determine how much the connection charge would be. Mr. Pahey felt that this was the City's problem. Pahey asked if the cost could be charged againstthe sewer b~dget. The Clerlc Ee1t that the unit charge couLd be charged against Chis area rather than agai.nst the bonds of 1966 and 1967, It cvas deter.mi.ned that the Frattal.one assessment had been $3,700. Pahey suggested that Mr. Prattal.one be rei.mUursed this amount as the City's shar.e of the lift station. Pa~e -10- M:[NUTES City Counci.l. March 7.4, 1.984 FratCalone The Attorney st2ted that thi.s could be made a part oL the deveLopment Li.ft contract that the C:LCy wo uld participate in the cost of Che lif.t Stati.on station to the exCent of. $3,70C payable upon completi.on of the job. (Cont.) The 33uilcling Inspector or City Cl.eric should then determine the connection charge Lor the other properties in the area. The Clerl< asked about the City's 80-7_0% pol.icy. P4r. Pahey stated that the $3,700 r.epresents 80%, therefore, the amounC should remai.n ~3,700. Mr. Fahey pointed out that i.f the 8-plex develops i.n the area, this will represent a big part of Che $3,700. P1r. Porsberg stated Chat he was agreeaUle to everything, except the way the ~3,700 would be recouped. Porsberg f.elt that the City shouJ.d absorb the $3,700 out of the secaer budgee, rather [han an extra connection cliarpe. Fahey pointed out that without the. lift station there would be no se~aer for the area. P9r. Pahey introduced the f:ollowing resoluti.on and moved its adoption: RI;SOLU7'ION N0. E34-3-1.04 - INS7'RUCTING TI{E CITY A'CTORN~Y TO DRAFT THE APPROPRIATP DEVEL~OPMENT CON'CRACT T~rT6d13EN TIIE CITX AND MR. PRANK FRATTALONE G][IEREI3Y THE CITY WILL CONTRIAUTE $3,700 TOWARDS TI-IF COST OP TH~ INSTALLATION OF T`3F. LIPT STATiON ON JTiSSICA COUR'L AND DIRECTING THP CITY ENGINPEIt AND CITY CLrRK TO D~~IPLOP A SATISrACTORY PLAN I'OR RECOUPING THIS MONEY PROh1 THF, EPFtCTFD PROPPRTIES SOUTIi OP COUN'LY ROAD C[d}IO WILL t~L~ USING THE SF.WER LINL [d11ICF1 TIIIS LIPT STATION 41ILL T~E SRRVING The f.oregoing resolution was duly seconde<( by Mrs< Scalze. Ayes ~3) Pahey~ Scalze~ Nardi.ni.. Nayes (2) Hanson, Forsberg. Resol.uCion <leclared adopted. Thi.s resolution appears i.n Resolution T3ook No. 11, Pages 17.3 and ll4. Prattalone Mrs. Nardini. aslced if Mr. Pratt:alone lias obtained the fil.l.i.ng per.mi.t Excavating from the LJatershed for his Lot f3 on Ryan Drive. Dlon-Agenda Mr. Prattalone repl.ie.d tliat he has a per.mit Eor one acre, and the Item No. 1 other permit shouLd be in to the City in a f.ew days. Mr. Prattalone reported that he i.s nearly completed with hi.s pondi.ng area on Lot I3. Mrs. Nardini requested that Che Engineer submit a written report on thi.s before Lot A is allowed to be filled. Pa~;e -11- MINOTES City Cotmcil. March 14, 1984 Freeway Mr. Kenneth Vohs appeared before the Council representing the Preeway Land Co. Land Company. Mr. Vohs requested that the Council consider approval of industrial revenue bonds for an addi.tion to their existing building. Agenda Item No. 7_5 Mr. Pahey introduced the followi.ng resolution and moved its adoption: RPSOLU'CION N0. 84-3-105 - CALLING POR A PUI3LIC HEARING ON MARCH 28, 1984 A'P 7:50 P.M. TO CONSTDF:R APPROVAL OF INDiJSTRIAL RL'VENUE IIONDS FOR PRF,~[dAY LAND COMPANY The foregoing resoluti.on coas duLy seconded by Mr. Porsberg. Ayes (5) Iiahey, T'orsberg, Nardini, Hanson, Scalz.e. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears i.n Resoluti.on Boolc No. 11, Page 7.15. Pol.i.cy On 1"tr. i'ahey reported to Mr. Vohs that the Ci.ty is consi.deri.n~; adopting Industrial a policy that cahen industrial revenue bonds are requested, Chat the Revenue Ci.ty requise that the conditions of Appendix P must be met in that 13onds development, whether ne~o construction or an additi.on. Agenda Mrs. Scal.ze pointed ouL- that some cities will not consider industrial Item No. 23 revenue bonds. Scalze also pointed out that Little Canada has not aslced for anything i.n return f.or approving these bonds. Mr.s. ~ardini did not feel that the City would be out of: li.ne requiring that ~ppendix P: be met. Mr.. Pahey introduced the foLlowing resolution and move<i its adoption: Rf:SOI.UTION N0. 84-3-106 - SE7'TING A CITY POLICY TAAT 6d}iBRF., TI~IE CITY APPROVL'S ~INDUS'LRIAL RZVENUP AONDS OR TAX ZNCRFMPNT FINANCING FOR NLW CONSTI.2UCTION OR ADDITIONS, TIIAT P.S A CONDITION OT TiIF APPROVAL THl: P,UiLDING I~P IIROIJGFIT IN I.INE WITI~I APPENDIX E RPQUIREMINTS AND THB INT~NT OF THF MOTION IS TO INCLI7DP THP APPLICATION SUt3MITTFD I3Y FRTEWAY LAND COMPANY AND ANY OTtI~R 13USINESS PNTITY 'PHAT WOULD APPLY [IGNCEFORTft The foregoi.ng resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini. Ayes (5) L'ahey, Nardiri, Fianson, Scalze, Porsberg. Nayes (0). Resolution declar.ed adopted, This resolution appears i.n Resolution P,oolc No. 11, Page llh. Pape -12- MINUTES City Counc~il March 14, 1984 'Pree Ins~ector Agenda Itiem No. 10 Mrs. Nardi.ni informed Mr. Horwath that the City felt that he did an excelLent ,job in the past as Tree InspecCOr. Mr. Porsberg, agreed, and stated that he wouid support hiri.ng Mr. Horwath on a contracCUal basis. Mr. Sweeney reported that there are f.orms that can be completed and submi.tted to tt~e Department of Economic SecuriCy to seC P1r. kiorwath up a; 'Lree Inspector on a contractual basis. 7'he Department of Economic Security would have to review these and act on them pr~ior eo the relationship being sec up. yr. Porsberg aslcecl about the City's other part-time hel.p. Pahey felt that the Council should talce care of: this case first. Mr. Hanson felt that the City should adopt a poLicy for. al.l part- time employees. Nardini stated that the Counci.l previ.ously discussed handLi.np., this on a case-by-case basis. Mrs. Sca1~e informed Che Council. that in Detroit I,alces it cvas determined that their volunterr fire department ~aould be eligible for unemployment compensati.on. The Clerk reporT.ed that various part-time jobs can be combined in order to achi.eve the dollar amount necessary f.or unempl.oyment. Pahey sug~;este<t that the City mi.~;ht have to re.quire that a par.t-time employee in the City hold no other Part-time positi.ons. Mr. Porsberg felt that the Council should handle Mr. HorwaCh's case at this time ancl felt that there may not be another problem. Mr. Fahey agreed. Mrs. Scalze i.ntroduced the following resoluti.on and moved its acloption: gP:SOLUTION N0. F34-3-107 - INS'tRUCTING TEIE CITY ATTORNPY TO SUBMIT THE PROPER CONTRACTS ~~~'~ TO THE DEPARTMENT OT ECONOMIC SECURITY FIIRING THOMAS EIORWATH AS TI[E CITX'S TREE :[NSPECTOR ON A CON'CRACTUAL I3ASIS. ~ The fore~oinp, resolution was duly seconcled by Mrs. Nardini, Ayes (4) Scalze~ Nardini, Hanson, PorsberF. Nayes (1) Pahey. Resolution declared adopted. This resoluCion appears in Resolution I3oolc No. 11, Pa~e 117. Mre Pahey felt that the City could enter into a private agreement with Mr. Ilorwath as an outside conLractor and take Mr. Ilorwath at his word. Pafle -13- MINUTES Ci.ty Council March 7.4, 1984 'Cree Mrs. Nardini and Mrs. Scal.ze stated that they were will.ing to go Inspector along with this. (Cont.. ) Mrs. Scalze introduced the fol.lowing resoluti.on and moved i.ts adopCion: RLSOLUTION N0. 84-3-108 - RESCINDING RESOLUTION N0. 84-3-107 The foregoing resoluti.on was duly seconded by Mrs. Nardini.. Ayes (5) Scal.ze, Nardini, Fahey, L'or.sberg, Ilanson. Nayes (0). Resoluti.on declared adopted. Th.i.s resolution appears in Resolution 13oolc No. 11, Page llfl. P4rs. Nardi.ni suggested t:hat Mr. Hor~vath be hi.red on a contractual basis as Weed Inspector also. Mr. Fahey i.ntroduced the following resolution and moved iCS acloption: R$SOLlJTION N0. £34-3-109 - INSTRUCTING TIIE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAPT AN INDPPPNUENT CONTRACTOR AGREFMENT HIItING TOM IIORWATII AS THE CITY' S TREE INSPECTOR AND WEED INS]?GCTOR FOR 1984 AT TEIE SAME RATT OP COMPENSATION AS IN 1983 The foregoing resolution was duLy seconded by Mrs. Nardini. Ayes (5) P'ahey, Nardini., Hanson~ Scal.ze, Forsberg. Nayes (0). Resol.uti.on declared adopted. Thi.s resolution appears .in Resolution Iiook No. 11, Page ].19. Manu£actured The Attorney reported that he has submiteed a slightly revised Homes manufactured homes ord:i.nance and informed the City Clerlc to publish i.t. No further Council acti.on is necessary. Agenda Item No. 11 Mrs. Nar.dini reported Chat the Plann~ing Commission is concerned about the word "average" in the ordi.nance. The Attorney repli.ed that this was language suggested by the City Planner. I~aseball Mr. Jim Morelan appeared before the Council and i.nformed them that Pields he is recei.ving extra requests for baseball and softball fields. Morelan pointect out that the School District wants certai n f.'ields Non-A~;enda at Rellogg and that St. John's Chur ch wants to use their f.ields. Item No. 2 Mr. hlorelan Lel t that [he City can get by f.or this year, but Eelt there will be a shortage of. fields 1.n coming years, Page -14- Mr.~uTrs City Counci.J. March 7.4, 1984 Baseball Mr. Morelan poinCed out that the Ci.ty ocans no ball fieLds. Mor.elan Piel.ds pointed out that he has not given any consideration Co l.eagues from (Cont.) outside the City. PSrs. Scalze sCated that i.n the past there wasproperty on Centervil.le Road that caas suggested f.or ball f.i.elds• PYr. Porsberg pointed out that 20 f.ields could be Lilled and asked how many were enough. I'orsber.g asked how much money the CiCy could i.nvest in fi.elds that would sit most of the time. Mr. Fahey su~gested that the Ci.ty could buy some property on a contract -for-deed. Fahey f:el.t that the Ci.ty should purchase property in an area that it could turn around,sell the property in the Luture and malce a profit. 44r. Flanson suggest:ed that the Parks Commission pursue the property they feel is desireabLe and make a recommendztion Co the Council. Mr. Ilanson stated that the longer the money sits in the Park I'und unused, the more peopl.e coill be concerned that the City is not putting these funds to use. Mr. Porsber~ felt that the City should hold a publi.c hearing on any property the City proposes to purchase and use for ball f.ields. Mr. Fahey stated that he ctid not agree. P'ahey stated that if the property wer.e industrial, he ~vouLd not be pursuaded by a couple of resi.dents of the area that this would not be a p,ood use f:or Che property. Pahey stated that the Council must consi.der the gr.eater good of the City and secure this property Ior. generations Co come. P'ahey stated thah there must be give and take for Che benef.it of the whole City. Mr. Fahey i.ntroduced the followi.ng resoluti.on and moved i.ts adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 8~r3-110 - AIJTIIORI.7,ING TFIE PARK C014htISSION TO NPGO'CIATF OPTIONS ON PARK LAND Si1ITAIlLE POR THE NIsEDS Ol? THE CI7'Y, SilI3.TECT 'PO PINAL APPROVAL T3Y TISE COUNCIT The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Nlrs. Scalze. Ayes (5) rahey~ Nardi.ni.~ Scal.ze, 1[anson~ i'orsberg. Nayes (0). Resoluti.on cieclared a<lopted. This resoluti.on appears in Resolution I~ook No. 11, Page 120. Mr. Morelan requested that he represent the Park Commi.ss:i.on on this matter due to his interest and lcnocoledge. Page -15- nrNUTrs Ci.ty Counci.t March 1G, 1984 i~asebal.l Mr. Porsberg sugpested that perhaps i.t was Ci.me to tallc to the Pi.elds School Board on the purchase of. ipooner Parlc. P1rs. D]ardini. asked (Cont.) i.f the Councii f.elt that a l.etter should be sent to the School. Board members in this regard. Mcs. Scalze commented that the Ci.ty has the excl.usive use of these ball.fieLds now. Mr. Forsberg stated that he f.eLt the purchase of Spooner Park ~vas more i.mportanC than ba11 f.i.elds. rtr. Pahey f.elt thaC the Ci.ty should loclc up other pi.eces of, property, and if: the School Di.strict wanCS to se1.1 Spooner Park, the City wi.ll find Che money. Mrs. ScaLze stated that she ~vould lilce to see what. happens :i.n Lauderdale bef.ore the City ~;ets involve.d in Spooner Park. Scalz.e did not f.eel that the I.,auderdale matter would take lonp, to be eesolved. 'Che rest oE the Council was a~;reeable to thi.s. Prosecuti_on The Ci.ty Attorney reported that the City cannot assess the costs Cos[s of: prosecution baclc against ~ cerrai.n develooment, as thi.s is a publi.c ser.vice the Ci.ty provi.des. The Attorney reported that the Agenda incidence of. misdemeanors i.s doorn si.nce the first of. the year. Item No. 17 Al.so a].ot of the types of: cases that the Ci.ty is involved i.n never go to trzal.. Mrs. Scalze stated that the Counci.l felt that perhaps the problem could be elimi.nated in certain ar.eas of the City. Mrs. Scalze suggested that the pr.oUl.em be monitored and if i.t becomes a problem again, the owners of. the bui.ldi.ng should be called in to the Council. Mrs. Nardini aslced that the Counci.l be ~;iven the reports f.rom the Sheri.f.f:'s Department, so that the call.s can be moni.tored. '1'he City CLerlc repli.ed that he wil.l provi.de the Counci.l with the monChLy Sheri.ff.'s r.eports. Ruth & The City Attorney reported that the Commissi.oner of Land has set Demont a vaLue on t.he Ruth and Dem onC property of: $30,000. This was tax- Property forf.eited property that the City had desi.gnated f.or ponding, but was not usi.ng as such. In oreler to get an unrestri. cted deed on ~P~n~~ the property, the City wil.l have to purchase it. Item No. 13 The AtCOrney reported that ot the $30,000 purchase pri.ce, the City wi.ll get $4,500 returned. Page -16- ral.~uz~s Ci.ty Council. hiarch 14, 1.98[t Ruth & Demont (ConC.) Cub & Dental Offi.ce Connection Char~es Agenda Item No. 14 MSA Report Viking Dr. Agenda Item No. 15 Stop Si.~;n Count:y RcL D & LaBore Rd. Agenda Item No. 18 The City Attorney su~gested that Che City get another apprai.sal on the property i.f. it has a questi.on wi.th the value set by Che Land Commi.ssi.oner. The City Cl.erk pointed out that the property is zoned :2-2 and could be spl.i.t into t:wo lots. The Attcnrney also commented that the property will need to be surveyed. Mrs. Nardi.ni felt that the City shoutd have an appraisal of. the proPerty done. P1rs. Scal.ze introcluced the f.oll.owing resoluti.on and moved its aciopti.on: RL;SOI.UTION D10. 84-3-111 - AUTHORII:CNG TI~IE CITY PNGINEFR TO SURV~Y Tlil? RUTA AND DEP40NT PtiOP~RTY The f.ore~oing resol.ution was dul.y seconded by Mr. Porsberg. Ayes (4) Scalze, Porsberg, klanson, Fahey. Nayes (1) Nardini. Resolution declared adopted. This resol.uti.on appears i.n Reso].uti.on I~oolc No. ll., Page 121. The Attorney r.eported thaC Cub has hi.red an appraiser for their. propert:y w:ith r.egard to Che connecti.on char.ge formula, however, the dental oEf.i.ce has not. Mr. I~lanson reported that Cub will be opening, i.n [he summer. The Engi.neer reported that he has not fi.ni.shect the MSA report on on the turnover. of Nikin~ Drive. Mr. Forsberg reported t.hat the County stu<lied the intersecti.on at Cotmty Roacl D and LaBore and decicled to reverse the stop s~ign. It. was originally requested that a 4-way stop be installed. F.>age -i]- MINt7TF.S City Council March 14, 1984 ~1etro Area Ntr. Porsberg reported that the Publi.c Works Superintendent has Mutual Aid recommended that the City enter into the Mutual A~id Agreement. Agenda Mrs. Scalze i.ntroctuced the f:ollowing resolution and moved its adopCion: Item No. 19 RL'SOLU'PION N0. F34-3-112 - All'CHORI7.ING JOINT AND COOPERATIVI: AGREF.MLNT POR USG OP PPRSONNL;L AND EQUIPMF.NT - RL,GTONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOCZAT20N The f.oregoi.ng resoluti.on coas duly seconded by Mrs. Nardi.ni. Ayes (5) Scal.ze, Nardi.ni, Hanson, Por.sberg, Pahey. Nayes (0). Resol.ution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resol.uCi.on Book No. 11., Page 17_Z. CanaUury Mr. Forsberg reported that to correct the draina~e problem at the Condos corner of Demont and Canabury Drive the cost wi.ll be $3,500. Porsberg recommended that thi.s be approved as a change-order to A~;enda the Sleepy Hollow dr.ainage project. Item No. 20 Mr. Forsberg i_ntroduced the followi.ng resoluti.on and moved its adopti.on: RTSOLII'CION N0. 84-3-1J.3 - APPROVING A CItANGE-ORDER POR CORRFCTION OF THP DRAINAGE PROt~LEM AT TH1~. INTBRS~CTION OP UEMONT AND CANAI~URY DRIVL; IN THE , AMOU~VT OF $3,500 ~ The fore~;oi.ng resoluti.on caas duly seconded by Mr. l~Ianson. ~ Ayes (5) Forsberg, llanson, Fahey, Sca7.ze, Nardini.. ~ayes (0). ResoLution decl~red actopted. Thi.s resoluti.on appears in Resoluti.on ]3ook No. L1, I'age 1?3. The City Attorney askec( who will pay this $3,500. The City C1erl.c commented that i.t may be nece.ssary to call a public hearing on thi.s for the condomi.niums. Mrs. Scalze pointed out tliat a public hearin~; was not heLd on the rest oL theproject. The Clerlc replied that thi.s was because the assessments were negotiated. Mrs< Scalze suggested that the Ci.ty negotiate the $3,500 ~oi.th the condomini.ums. Mr. Pahey sug~ested that a letter be wri.tten to the condominium owners~ and inform them of the $3,500 cost and see i.f. they wi11 agree to the assessment. The Attorney commented that if the City change-orders the pr.oject and the condos will not pay, then a publi.c heari.n~; wi.ll have to be held. The Attorney thou~ht the cost would be about $35 per condo. Page -18- MI.NU~rrs City Council March 1~F, 1984 Canabury The Attorney suggested that the condominiums may even be able to Condos piclc up this cosC from Cheir maintenance f.unds. The Attorney (Cont.) suggested that the City Clerk carite the condos a l.etter.. Mr. Fahey introduced the foLlowing resolut:ion and moved its adoption: RESOI,(JTION N0. 84-3-1.1.4 - RESCINDING RGSOLU'TION A10. 84-3-117 AND DIRFCTING TIiI: CI'I'Y CLGRK 'LO CONTACT ItARLAN ROLdLAND OP CANAI3UF2Y CONDOP9I~IUMS AND INFORM iIIM OF 'CFIE COST OF CORRPCTING 'PIIE DRAINAGF 1?ROP,LFM ON DEMONT AND CP.°lAT3URY DRIVE AND INEORM HIM Tl-IAT THIS IS THE ONLY ASS3:SSMGNT TIi~ CITY ANTICIYA'CF.S IN TIIE PROJF:CT The foregoi.ng resoLution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Ayes (5) Pahey~ Scalze, Hanson, Nardi.ni., P'orsber~;. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resol.ution Aook No. 11, Page 124. Signs Mrs. Nardini reported that the City's business community is ready to come to the Council meeting on signs in mass. Nardi.ni felt A~;enda that t:he meeti.ng shoul.d just be a worlcshop for the Counci-1 to hassle Item No. 21 over the sign qvestion. P1r. Fahey suggested tltat the busi.ness community be informed that this meeti.n~ is just for the Couucil to hassle over what they can come up wi.th and [he Council is aware of: the recommendations made by the Sipn Committee. The Ci.ty Attorney pointed out that an amendment to the 7,oni.ng Code would require f.our votes. Preezing The City Clerlc recommended that the Council request thaC the Government government ai.d formula be frozen for 1985. P9rs. Scalze asked why Aid Formula the City would request this, when it is not happy wi.th this tormula. Agenda The Clerk responded that the City would request thi.s and then Item No. 7_4 this will give the Le~;i.slature time to work further on the problem. Mr. Pahey i.ntroduced the fol.lowing resolution and moved its adoption: RGSOLUTION N0. £14-3-115 - RT:COMMENDING THAT THE S'LATE OP MINNGSOTA LOCAL GOVPRNMENT AID PORMIJLA BE PR07.IiN POR FISCAL YPAR 1935 Page -1.9- MzNUTrs City Council March 14, 19£34 Government The f.oregoi.ng resoluti.on was duly seconded by Mr. }ianson. Aid Pormula Ayes (5) L'ahey, }[anson, Nar<lini, P'orsber.g, Scalze, (Cont.) Nayes (0). Resolution declared aclopted. This reso].ution appears in Resolution Ilootc No. 1.7., Pa~;e 125. Additional The City Clerk requested that tdashington Pederal of. Stil.lwater be Investor added to the Ci.ty's i_nvestment depositories. Ap,encta Mr. Pahey i.ntroduced the f.ollocaing resol.ution and moved i.ts adoption: Item ~o. 27 RESOLUTION N0. £34-3-11.6 - APPROVING WASHINGPON TEllERAL OT' S'CILLWATER AS AN ADDI'CIONAL SNVESTOI.t POR Tk[T CITY 017 LLTTLE CANADA POR 1984 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Nar.dini. Ayes (5) Pahey9 Nardini, N~nson, Scalze, Porsberg. Nayes (0). Resol.ution declared adopted. Th~is resolution appears i.n I3esolut~ion 13ook No. 11, Pa~;e 1?_6. Voter The City C1erl< suggested that the City adopt t:he voter regis[ration Regi.strati.on system as outlined in Council agendas whereby the City woul.d no System Change lonp,er lceep registration car.ds. 1'hese cards would be kept at the County and the City would recei.ve a computer:ization. Agenda Item ~o. 7.8 Mrs. Scalze introduced the followin~ resoluti.on and moved its adopti.onc RESOLUTION N0. 8~4-3-117 - APPROVING TFIF, PROPOSGD CHANGE IN VOT1iR REGISTRATiON CARD SYSTrT4 The foregoi.n~; resoluti.on was duly seconded Uy Mr. L'orsber~;. Ayes (5) Scalze, rorsberg, Hanson, Nardi.ni., Pahey. Nayes (0). Resolution decl.ared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution T~ook No. 11, Page 127. Spri.nlcler P1r. Pahey suggested Y,hat as part of the 19£35 water projects, that System the City FIa11 be spcinl.clerecl as well as settin~ up the Pire Ha11 City Ha11 & for sprinlclerin~. Mr. P~ihey reported th at Che Fi.r e I)epa~rCment Pire I[all h1s been discussinp, thi_s. The Fire Hal.l. has a two i.nch water line, and it cannot be sprinklered wiCh Chis size line. Page ZO rit!vuTrs City Cotmcil ~larch 14, 1.934 Spri.nlclerinn ~Ir. Porsberg pointed out: Chat there is a six i.nch watermai.n just a f.ew Leet f.rom Che I'ire Hall. PorsUerg stated that i.t would not (Cont.) be expensive to run this line into the bui.ldi.ng. Mr. i'ahey reported that the Fi.re Department may instal.l the spri.nkler system themselves wi.t11 volunteer labor. Mr. llanson stated that he would support Chis in view of Appendix P, Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the City ~is not asking businesses to retro-fi.t. Narcli.n:i. sup,gested that the Council get a price on the spri.nlcler system. Fahey su~;p,ested that the Engineer esti.maCe what it would c.ost t:o run a six-inch 1i.ne to the Ci.ty klal.l. and ri.re }{al.l. The Cler)c repor.t:ecl [hat t:he Ci.ty Hall would Ue Improvement No. £34-7 and the Pire Ha11 would be No. 84-8. Mr. I'ahey aslced i.f the City could bond for this. The Clerlc replied that he woul.d determine this. The Pngineer. di.d not thinlc it wo~ld cost more than a couple thousand dollars Co run the si.x-inch lines. Mr. Porsberg introduced the following resolution and moved ~its adoption: RPSOLUTION N0. 84-3-11.8 - REQIJPSTTNG PRANIC WINIECKI TO GIVIi THF. CITY A PROPOS~I. POR SPRTNKLF.RING THT~: CI7'Y CPNTL;R The f.oregoing resol.ution was duLy seconded by Mrs. Nardi.ni-. Ayes (5) Porsberg, Nardini, }lanson, Pahey, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resol.ution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution 13oolc No. 11, Page 17_8. Comparabl.e In(ormation i.s conCai.ned i.n the ag,endas on the Mi.nnesota League's Worth Policy comparable worth poJ.icy. e1~;enda [tem No. 30 Approvi.ng Mrs. Nardi.ni. i.ntroduced the f:oLlowi.ng resolution and movect :i.ts adoption: Vouchers A~,en~~~ RI;SOLUTION N0. 54-3-119 - APPROVING TkIG Item No. 31 VOUCI-IERS Page -21- Mi.NiIT~6 City Counci.l March 14, 1984 Vouchers The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. (Cont.) Ayes (5) Nardi.ni., Scalze, Hanson, Porsberg, I'Ahey. Nayes (0). Resol.uti.on decl.ared adopted. This resol.ution appears in Resoluti.on IIook No. 7.1, Page 129. Adjourn Mr. l~orsberg introduced the following resolution and moved iCS a<lo~tion: Agenda RESOLUTIO~ N0. 84-3-120 - AD,TOURNING ICem No. 33 The f.oregoin~ resoluCi.on was duly seconded by Mrs. Scal.ze. Ayes (5) I'orsber~;, Scalze, i~lanson, Fahey, Nardini. Nayes (0)= Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resoluti.on 1Sool< No. 11, Page 129. 'Lhere beinp no fur.ther busi.ness, the meeti.ng was adjourned at 1.1:07 PeM. Respectf.ull.y suUmi.tted, 1 ~, :c:~. ~~~<~ ,<~_ ~~ ~~ >.~. _r, Kathleen GLanze. ~ Recordi.ng Secretary PaFe -7_2-