03-28-84 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i4INU'PIdS C~ity Council iNarch 28, 1984 Knox AdcCi.ti.on A r.epresenCati.ve of 1<nox I,umber appeared before the Council and explained the building plans Knox has for the removal of 5,300 tlpenda squtire 1.`eet of existing structure and replaci.ng ~it wi.tki 1.,950 square Item No. E3 feet concrete str.ucture. The representative explained that this structure ~oould handle merchandi.zi.ng f:or about Lour months eacki year and would be more appeal.:i.n~ in appearance and easi.er to mai.nr.ain. 7'k~e structur.e wi.ll. be l.ocated about: 20 feet from the bui.ldi.n~;. i°Ir. Porsberg aslced i.f Knox had other building plans for. Cheir site. The representative r.epl.ied that they do have other plans i.n the process, buC it w:ill be June or July bef.or.e these are f.inalizeci. Nardin~i Mayor lianson opened the puUli.c hearing on the Nardi.ni. rezon~i.ng 12ezoning proposal. f.or property on Demont irom R -2 zoning to 13-3. PTO~OS11 Mr. Ilanson pointed out t:liaC the acti.on taken by the PLanninY Agenda Commi.ssion on this proposal dicl not: ~;i. ve the Counci.l a lot o£ Item Dlo. 7 direcCion. Mx. Pahey staCed that gi.ve n the divisi.on of: the Commissi.on, the matter should not be sent baclc to the Planni.n~ Commi.ssion. T~(rs. Scala.e suggested that the Pl.annin~; Commi.ssi.on may have been lootci.ng Lor a 1ittle di.r.ect:i.on Lrom the public hearing. Tlte Planner stated that i.n hi.s memo oF. March ?1 he attempted to respond to the concerns rai_sed at the Planni.ng Commi.ssion meeting. Mr, DeLonais, Planni.ng Commissi.on Vice-Chai.rman, reported that t:he Plaiming Commi.ssi_on assumed that t_he matter would be returned to them. The PLanner pointed out that the Planning Comm'i.ssi.on has 60 days to respond to a matter and if. no acti.on is tat<en i.n that time, the deci.sion is up to the Council. Mr. Hanson asked iL the Council weis bound to return the matter to the Planning Comm~iss:i.on. Mr. Pahey, i.n revi.esvi.ng the ordin<+nce, poi.nted out that the ordinance provides that a conditi.onal use per.mit shall not be ~ranted until the Council. has r.ecei.ved a report from the Planni.n~ Commission, or 60 days have elapsecl since the mr.itter went bef.ore the P7.anni.ng Commi.s<.;ion. Mr. Pahey sugYested that the Council hold the hearing on the matter and then return it to the Planni.ng Cornmission. TQr.. Mark McCul.lough, Attorney repr.esent:ing Mrs. Petersen and Mr. Villeaux, appeared befor~ Che Council. Mr. N[cCull.ou~;h request:ed that the Coimcil dismzss the Nardini rezoni.n~; petiti.on. If that does not happen, McCullough requested that t:he matter be continued until hi.s cl.i.ents could petition the City to rezone thei.r. property to R-i.. Page -5-