My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-84 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
03-28-84 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:36:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MSNIlTI!:S <br />Ci.ty Counci.l. <br />r1arch 2£3, 19£~~s <br />~ardini <br />Rezoni.np, <br />Proposal <br />(ConC.) <br />Mr. P1cCu11ougki subm~i.tted co the Council a peti_tion si.~+ned by 63 <br />residences in the area, 50 inobilehomes and 13 single fami.l.y homes, <br />~PP~si.ng the rezoni.ng. <br />Mr. Hanson aslced if.' the City hact t:o determi.ne the adequacy of the <br />peCi.tion. 'Che Planner. pol.nted out Chat State StaCUte only requi.res <br />that properti.es wi_thi.n 3.50 f.eet of: the ef.f.ecte<1 propcrty have to <br />be notified. <br />r1r. Pahey st~ated that he saw the peti.ti.on as expressi.ng the feeli.ngs <br />of the peonle i.n the area. Fahey al.so poi.nteci out that those si.gnin~; <br />the petition were not aslced thei.r Leelings on a potenti.al car w~sh <br />and parlcing 1ot on thi.s proper.ty. <br />Mr. ~IcCul.l.ounh stated that t:hi.s was true, Uut i_t ~aas his understanclin,n., <br />that: hi_s cl.i_ents would object to this al.so. <br />'L'he Planner poi.nted ouC tt~at under a rezoni.ng to T3-3, the City has <br />no authori.ty to request the-. use oL the propert:y. The Counci.l must <br />judge thes acceptabi.lit:y oC: the uses i.n the zonin;~ di_str~.i.ct. 7'he Ci.ty <br />clnnot bind t:he property to a certai.n use an~ hotd the commitment. <br />Mr. McCullough stated that this caas their concern, that Che zoning <br />would be open-ended and any permitted use in thc di.stri.cC coul.d end <br />up on t}iis property. <br />Mr. Hanson poi.nteel out that a condi.tional use permi.t could be requi_red <br />ancl the Ci.ty would have more control. <br />Mr. Pahey a,lced i.f the Ci.ty could bind the property to a certai.n use <br />imder a busi.ness PIID or RP, i~n~n~, 7'he Planner sCated Chat tliis was <br />correct. <br />^4rs, Nardi.ni asl,ed i.f the proposed t.ise woul.d be permi.Cted ~in an i2T3, <br />Mr. Li.cht sttited that a car wash would not be permi.tted and he doubCeci <br />that a parici.n~ ].ot would be. <br />Mrs. Scalze stat:ed that. the property A1r. McCull.ough i.s repre,enCi.ng <br />is 1)-3 and the Ci.ty cannot insul.~te thi.s Property from other B-3 <br />pronerty surroundi.ng it. Scalze poi.nCed out Chat Il-3 also r:tUut:ts <br />the Peter.son nnd Vi1l.eaux bactcyards. Mr. McCu ll.ough stated that they <br />would deal. ~oi.th that probl.ein when i.t ari.ses. <br />T7r. F~hey stated Chat he was not inclined to put something in the area <br />that oroul.d create problems f.or Che resi_dents. Pahc.ry stetted thaC the <br />Cfty shoul.d not rezone Lhe property unless i.t: has control. over the <br />type of business that would no in. <br />Mr. McCul.lou{;h stated that. the peo~le in thc nrea are very concerned <br />about the probl.ems at Iloggsbreath expandi.nn i.nto theis backyards. <br />Page -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.