My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-84 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
03-28-84 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:36:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:50:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mz~oTr:s <br />c~cy cou„~;~. <br />March 28, 19£34 <br />Nard:i.ni. The ~Planner sCated that he did noC thi_nlc iC made any sense Co <br />Rezoning rezone to 13-3 and staf:ed that the only way to fi;et control. for Che <br />Proposal Ci.ty would be to rone P1JD. 'Phi.s wi11 give the Council. rev i.ew. <br />(Cont.) <br /> Mr. T~ahey pointed out t:hat Mr. Durray wi.11 not care :i.f. the property <br /> is zoned PIID as long as he can put i.n hi.s c ar wash. Pahey 11so <br /> poi.ntecl out that this would benefi.t. the pro perty owners as i.t gi.ves <br /> the Counci.l. control. <br />`~r. Durray pointed out that the property i, not saleabl.e as R-2. <br />Durray poi.ntec.t ouC the locati.on of Che property and stz~ted that: <br />the propert:y i.s too large to Leeive vacant. Durray sCated that <br />someChi.n~; ~ail.l. eventual.ly be, done w~i.th the property. <br />}lanson stated Chat there zs a hardshi.p placed on the owner of the <br />property by leavi.ny, it veictinC as the owner sti.l.l f;ets the Cax <br />,tatement each year. <br />Mr. I3i.1.1. Davison, resident oF. the Grai.ler courr., staCed that the <br />peopl.e in the trailer court have a lar;e i.nvestment. in t:hei.r. <br />property. Davison staCed that he was noC i.n favor of: the rez.oning <br />of the property and stated that he was :i.n f:avor of the properCy <br />remaini.ng R-?_. Davi,on st.:at.ed that he was not in f.avor of: tiny <br />development that woul.d come in and devalue his properCy and make <br />i-t harder to sell.. <br />P1r. Davi.son stat:ed that Demont. i.s i.n a bacl stake of. repai.r and <br />pointed out Chat. t:he Couney is not wi.lling to repai.r the road. <br />D~zvi.son stated that Demont i.s currentl.y a nrossl.y overtraiveled <br />roacL Mr. Davison stated tiiat a business of' any lcln<t on thi.s <br />property would just compoundthe problem. <br />Davison poi_nted out that the R-2 zoning i.s currently a buffer. <br />Mrs. 'Ci.mmons stated thaC a 1ot of. the Planni.ng Comm:i.ssi.on's questi.ons <br />have been answered at thi.s meet.i.ng. 'Ci.mmons also pointed out that <br />[he Planner's March 21 memo was not avai.lable at the C:i.me of: the <br />Pl.annin~ Commission meeting. <br />hlr. I'orsberg poi.nted out that the Crailers are currenCl.y non- <br />conf:orming uses. <br />Mr. Pahey stated that he: ~aouJ.d hate to see P1rs. Peterson and Nlr.. <br />Vil.l.eaux spend the money for rezoning their properties needlessl.y. <br />P'ahey sugc;ested that r.he reside~tts of the area and ~ir. Durray get <br />together and worlc out a compromi.se. <br />Mrs. 'fiinmons asl<F<1 for information on the control.s the C:i.ty would <br />have wZder a PUD zone or RIi zone. Timmons stated that tlte Pl.anni.ng <br />Commissi.on should have thi.s ~in£:ormat.i.on when maki.ng theis deci.sion. <br />Pa~;e -9-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.