04-25-84 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r~ cr!trx',;s City Counc'i.l. Apri1 ?_5, 19H4 Emp,on i~1r. T,icht poi.nted out_ t1~ai: Mr. Em~~son ~aas concer.necl because of ~1atter a council. resol.ut~i.on regarclin~ v~r.iarices i.n this area. 21r. Licht: (ConC.) stated Chat he sasa no just~.ification Lor a var-iance for a suostandacd 7.oe in thi.s ce.i>e as tJ~ere i:~ t:},~e 'land available to bring Ghe ].oC to 10,00q square f.eet. T4rs. Scalze. stakc.cl tl~~aC she tlioughC thaC Resol.ution Dlo. 83-6-274 dealt. eaith ~Ir. I3ehr's nroperty as }zis property ~aas ,nade. small.er because tl~e Ci.ty jog~ed the ro~d. Mrs. ica].ze chou~;ht that Mr.. Johnson was ~~ai_d f:or hi.s pror>erty. Scalze >t1Ced that the vari~nce thait woul.d be a7.7.owed on t:he Be M- property t:~ould be for a f.ronC yard setb~~clc and Ch,.zC she d~id not recaLl any variance di.scussed for mi.ni_mum lot size. ~ P4e. J,~i.cht i.nLormed the Coi.~nc~i_1 that: he also i_nformed Mr. i?mp,on r_hat the C~ity coi.ild not assure, him i:hat a house bui_1t on L,ots ?_1 through 24 wou7.cl be more thnn 10 feet f.rom tlie si_de yarcl. Licht a1,o reporCecl that i.t w~s su~gested Co P4r. I?mpson thst hc »urchase Lot ?1 in order to have ji.ir~isdicC~(.on over it. Mr.s, Nardi.rii. anreed Chat ~i_:E there is enou,n,}~t pr.operCy t:o have a 1.0,000 squarc Eoot l.ot, then t:here ;is no just~if~icaLi_on Eor a variarzce. ?~4r. 'f.~ahey a~;reed. '~ahey poi.nt:ed oi.it, k~owever, thait some Counc7.7. do~on the li.ne could ch~in~;e tlie roini.mum square foo[age requirement or setback requ:i.eemenCS or even s;rant a v~ri.ance. tifr. I~'ethey stat~d that Che c~.irrent Counc:i.J. ~i.s not :i.nc1.ined Co ;r~nC a v~zriance, but 1.C cemnot guarantee anytnirip,. ill~mnes Mr. 11an>on opened the public kiearing on t];ie I,Cimrnes request foe Pro~osal J?~JD zoning i.n oeder to construct: a;eira;e on h~is property. ~„enda P~1r. ?'ahey poini:ed out that the 7?l~nni.n~; Comm~ission [abled th~ Zten~ P!o. 6 rnltCer pencli.n, the outcome o£ the public hear~i.no. P1hcy staCCd ti~at C1~e Coi.mcil shoul.d ho7.d the publ.ic hearing and tPien refer the matGer b~cl< to the ??].~nning Commissione T'here were no ob;jectors presenC to the 7<-i.mmes pr.oposal.> t~irs. Scalze 1,ke~.d ~ahy i~!r. K~immes d~id not spl.i.t the propert~ i_n order that: the prooosed ~~ra~e be on thc same l.ot ,as n~i.s bustiness. >calze stated Chat the b~nck end of; the properC~ could be spl:Lt vff to accompl.i.sh this. ~Ir. Kimmes stated Chnt h~ was not, oppos~,.d t:o tl~~is. Kimmes sCated t1~1t the Planner su~;geste<l tl~e PtJP zoni.ng. }'~i,~' -~--