Laserfiche WebLink
r~zNU•rrs <br />Ci.ty Council <br />May 9, 1.9£34 <br />P4etro Coi.mci.l. Mrs. Nardini. commented that there has been concern expressect that <br />(Cont.) no one knows what type of waste :is bei.ng brought i.n and the ef.fect <br />it may have in the future. T4r. Wiger repli.ed that. there are competitors <br />of Mr. Prattalone's who would take the waste. Mr. Wiger commented <br />that the Metro Counci_1 assumed that the City had cri.teria for <br />approvi.ng the permit. <br />Mr. I'orsberg stated that he and Mr. Hanson wal.ked the are.a and the <br />resi.dents of. the trai.ler court have complaints about the Li.lling. <br />Forsberg stat:ed that these residents have been informed at the C:i.ty <br />level that they are i.n a non-conf.ormi.n~; use and, therefore, have no <br />r.ight to complain. <br />Mr. Fahey poi.nted out that there has only been one complaint at Che <br />City Center.. <br />'~r. Porsberg stated that he does not oppose the Eilli.n~;, but would <br />like the project done right. <br />Mr. Pahey stated that the Council probabl.y did not aslc tlie questions <br />i.t should have renardi.ng the project. <br />Mr. lianson felt that perhaps the PCA shoul.d be i.ssuing the permi.ts <br />first. <br />Mr. Pahey Le1T. thaC the PCA could be noCi.f.ied not to malce any excepCi.ons <br />i.n thei.r regulati.ons when consi.dering Chi.s permit. <br />Mr. Porsberg asked if the Fngineer checlcs on the ti.ll.:i.ng operaT.i.on. <br />Mr. Carley r.eplied that they checlc i.t every coupl.e of days. Carley <br />stated that when Mr. Prattalone took the permit Y,here was never <br />any menti.on of t1.ie Northwest I~ank. <br />Mr. Pahey agai.n commented that the PCA should be inf.ormed not to appl.y <br />thei.r. re~;uJ.ations in a lax manner. ~1r. Porsberg agreed. <br />n1r. T'orsberg commented that perhaps there sliould be a time l.i.mit put <br />on the fil.ling duri.ng the evening hours for the benefit of the trailer <br />court. <br />T4r. Sdiger stated thaC he preferred that the Met Council ac.tect :i.n favor <br />of the permit tomorroio~ but thatthe PCA be informed about the City's <br />concerns. <br />T~[rs. Scalze i.nformed Mr. Gliger that she has a neip,hbor who is l.ocated <br />in I,i.ttle Canada who i.s concerned about fi.lling in Maplewood on adjacent <br />pr.operty. Mrs. Scatze has refer.red thi.s person to Mr.. FJi.ger. P4r, 6diger <br />stated t:hat he wi7.1. spealc to the Maplewood City yanager about this. <br />Mr, idi.p,er also informed the Counci.l that i.t should be getCing reimbursement <br />of its $4,200 for an environmental study that was done fairly soon, <br />Page -ll.- <br />